green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
4.6 score
“prior to erisa, pension plans commonly provided for a forfeiture of benefits in the event a former employee entered into competition with the sponsoring employer. erisa . . . proscribes such practices”
Treatment trajectory · 1980 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1980
2003
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 17 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Vink v. SHV North America Holding Corp.
prior to erisa, pension plans commonly provided for a forfeiture of benefits in the event a former employee entered into competition with the sponsoring employer. erisa . . . proscribes such practices
cited
Cited "see"
Sullivan v. LTV Aerospace and Defense Co.
See Pollock v. Castrovinci, 476 F.Supp. 606 (S.D.N.Y.1979), aff'd without opinion, 622 F.2d 575 (2d Cir.1980); Paladino v. Taxicab Indus.
cited
Cited "see"
Financial Institutions Retirement Fund v. Office of Thrift Supervision
See Pollack v. Castrovinci, 476 F.Supp. 606, 617 (S.D.N.Y.1979), aff'd, 622 F.2d 575 (2d Cir.1980); see also In re C.D.
cited
Cited "see"
James Bryant v. International Fruit Product Company, Inc.
See Pollock v. Castrovinci, 476 F.Supp. 606 (S.D.N.Y.1979), aff'd without opinion, 622 F.2d 575 (2d Cir.1980); In re C.D.
discussed
Cited "see"
Kelly v. Chase Manhattan Bank
See Pollock v. Castrovinci, 476 F.Supp. 606, 618 (S.D.N.Y.1979), aff'd mem., 622 F.2d 575 (2d Cir.1980); see also Paris v. Profit Sharing Plan, 637 F.2d 357, 362 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 836 , 102 S.Ct. 140 , 70 L.Ed.2d 117 (1981); Chambers v. European American Bank & Trust Co., 601 F.Supp. 630, 638-39 (E.D.N.Y.1985).
cited
Cited "see"
Ruotolo v. Sherwin-Williams Co.
See Pollock v. Castrovinci, 476 F.Supp. 606, 617-618 (S.D.N.Y.1979), aff 'd without opinion, 622 F.2d 575 (2d Cir.1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
Amato v. Western Union International, Inc.
The Court notes, however, that Treas.Reg. § 1.401 — 2(b)(1) provides that, upon termination, an employer may recover any balance remaining in the fund as a result of actuarial error (if it has reserved that right in the plan agreement), but may not recover a surplus that has accumulated "as a result of a change in the benefit provisions or in the eligibility requirements of the plan.” 26 C.F.R. § l-401-2(b)(l); see Pollock v. Castrovinci, 476 F.Supp. 606, 612-13 (S.D.N.Y.1979), affd, 622 F.2d 575 (2d Cir.1980). 8 .
discussed
Cited "see"
DISTRICT 65, UAW v. Harper & Row, Publishers, Inc.
See Pollock v. Castrovinci, 476 F.Supp. 606, 616 (S.D.N.Y.1979), aff'd mem., 622 F.2d 575 (2d Cir.1980); Washington-Baltimore Newspaper Guild Local 35 v. Washington Star Company, 555 F.Supp. 257, 258 (D.D.
discussed
Cited "see"
Forrest Bugher v. Jack Feightner D/B/A Feightner Excavating Company
(2×)
See Pollock v. Castrovinci, 476 F.Supp. 606 (S.D.N.Y.1979), aff'd without opinion, 622 F.2d 575 (2d Cir.1980); Stamps v. Michigan Teamsters Joint Council No. 43, 431 F.Supp. 745 (E.D.Mich.1977) 2 A survey of cases where trustee actions against employers under LMRA and ERISA went to trial reveals some bench trials, see, e.g., Audit Services, Inc. v. Rolfson, 641 F.2d 757, 760 (9th Cir.1981) (right to jury trial not raised); Calhoun v. Bernard, 333 F.2d 739, 740 (9th Cir.1964) (same); Central Pension Fund of the International Union of Operating Engineers and Participating Employers v. Bryant, No…
discussed
Cited "see"
Morse v. Stanley
See Pollock v. Castrovinci, 476 F.Supp. 606 (S.D.N.Y.1979), aff’d, 622 F.2d 575 (2d Cir.1980) (holding that where employee was not prejudiced by trustee’s failure to distribute and file plan modifications, no penalty attached).
cited
Cited "see"
Washington-Baltimore Newspaper Guild Local 35 v. Washington Star Co.
See Pollock v. Castrovinci, 476 F.Supp. 606, 612-13 (S.D.N.Y.1979), aff’d, 622 F.2d 575 (2d Cir.1980).
cited
Cited "see"
LLC Corp. v. Pension Ben. Guaranty Corp.
Accord Pollock v. Castrovinci, 476 F.Supp. 606, 616-17 (S.D.N.Y.1979), aff'd, 622 F.2d 575 (2d Cir. 1980).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Bayou Steel Corp v. Mutual Marine Office, e
See also Perez v. Arya Nat’l Shipping Line, Ltd., 468 F.Supp. 799, 802 (S.D.N.Y.1979), aff'd mem., 622 F.2d 575 (2d Cir.1980), aff'd sub nom.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
James Bryant v. International Fruit Products Company, Inc.
(2×)
See also Pollock v. Castrovinci, 476 F.Supp. 606, 612 (S.D.N.Y.1979), aff'd without opinion, 622 F.2d 575 (2d Cir.1980), ("no ... amendment shall enable [the employer] to recover or divert from the exclusive benefit of the Participants the fund already deposited in the Trust.").
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Bryant v. International Fruit Products Co., Inc.
See also Pollock v. Castrovinci, 476 F.Supp. 606 (S.D.N.Y.1979), aff'd without op., 622 F.2d 575 (2d Cir.1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Dameron v. Sinai Hospital of Baltimore, Inc.
But see Stamps v. Michigan Teamsters Joint Council, 431 F.Supp. 745 (E.D.Mich.1977) (finding that 29 U.S.C. § 1132 (a)(1)(B) created legal, rather than equitable right) (opinion questioned by all subsequent cases); compare Pollack v. Castrovinci, 476 F.Supp. 606, 608-09 (S.D.N.Y.1979), aff'd without opinion, 622 F.2d 575 (2d Cir.1980) (legal rather than equitable right) with Rubin v. Decision Concepts, Inc., 566 F.Supp. 1057, 1059 (S.D.N.Y.1983) (questioning Pollack).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Walsh v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.
See also Pollock v. Castrovinci, 476 F.Supp. 606 (S.D.N.Y.1979), aff’d, 622 F.2d 575 (2d Cir.1980). .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Norwich Pharmacal Co.
v.
S/s Bayamon
v.
S/s Bayamon
79-7551.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.
Jan 4, 1980.
Published
Citer courts: S.D. New York (1)
Norwich Pharmacal Co.
v.
S/S Bayamon
79-7551
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Second Circuit
1/4/80
S.D.N.Y., 474 F.Supp. 240
AFFIRMED