green
Positive treatment
2.0 score
Treatment trajectory · 1980 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1980
2003
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
J. Geils Band Employee Benefit Plan v. Smith Barney Shearson, Inc.
However, “even assuming the question of reasonable diligence is ordinarily to be decided by the trier of fact, where no conflicting inferences can be drawn from the testimony an appeals court may make its own determination.” Id.; see Sleeper v. Kidder, Peabody & Co., 480 F.Supp. 1264, 1266 (D.Mass.1979) (noting that although the issue of reasonable diligence is factually based, it may be determined as a matter of law where the underlying facts are admitted or established without dispute), aff'd mem., 627 F.2d 1088 (1st Cir.1980).
cited
Cited "see"
Hill v. Equitable Bank
See Sleeper v. Kidder Peabody & Co., Inc., 480 F.Supp. 1264 (D.Mass.1979), aff'd., 627 F.2d 1088 (1st Cir.1980).
cited
Cited "see"
Downey v. Vernitron Corp.
See, Sleeper v. Kidder, Peabody & Co., Inc., 480 F.Supp. 1264, 1270 (D.Mass.1979), aff’d 627 F.2d 1088 (1st Cir.1980).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
O'ROURKE v. Jason Inc.
See, e.g., Sleeper v. Kidder, Peabody & Co., 480 F.Supp. 1264, 1265 (D.Mass.1979), aff'd without op., 627 F.2d 1088 (1st Cir.1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Chapman v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.
See, e.g., Sleeper v. Kidder Peabody & Company, Inc., 480 F.Supp. 1264, 1266 (D.Mass.1979), aff'd, 627 F.2d 1088 (1980); Dandorph v. Fahnestock & Company, 462 F.Supp. 961 (D.Conn.1979); Kennedy v. Josephthal & Company, Inc., et al., Fed.Sec.L.Rep.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Osserman
v.
Gloger
v.
Gloger
79-1480.
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit.
May 30, 1980.
627 F.2d 1088
Published
Osserman
v.
Gloger
79-1480, 79-1491
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS First Circuit
5/30/80
1
D.Mass.
VACATED AND REMANDED