green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
3.6 score
“congress did not intend to impose a duty to provide the kind of individualized attention urged by plaintiff here, but rather envisioned that a fiduciary could discharge its obligations through the use of an explanatory booklet”
Treatment trajectory · 1980 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1980
2003
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 9 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
In Re: Unisys Corp (Mem Op)
congress did not intend to impose a duty to provide the kind of individualized attention urged by plaintiff here, but rather envisioned that a fiduciary could discharge its obligations through the use of an explanatory booklet
cited
Cited "see"
Williams v. Adams
See Dolan v. Gotta, 481 F.Supp. 475, 480 (M.D.Penn.1979), aff'd 633 F.2d 209 (3d Cir.1980) (firing shots at vehicles tire after driver had rammed vehicle into police car was reasonable).
cited
Cited "see"
Shiffler v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United States
See Allen v. Atlantic Richfield Retirement Plan, 480 F.Supp. 848 (E.D.Pa.1979), aff'd, 633 F.2d 209 (3d Cir.1980).
cited
Cited "see"
Lee v. Union Elec. Co.
See Allen v. Atlantic Richfield Retirement Plan, 480 F.Supp. 848, 851 (E.D.Pa.1979), aff'd, 633 F.2d 209 (3d Cir.1980). 5.
discussed
Cited "see"
Lerra v. Monsanto Co.
See Allen v. The Atlantic Richfield Retirement Plan, E.D.Pa., 1979, 480 F.Supp. 848 , aff’d mem. 3 Cir., 1980, 633 F.2d 209 ; Vaughan v. Metal Lathers Local 46 Pension Fund, S.D.N.Y., 1979, 474 F.Supp. 613, 620 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Africa v. City of Philadelphia
See, e.g., Dolan v. Golla, 481 F.Supp. 475, 480 (M.D.Pa.1979), aff'd, 633 F.2d 209 (3d Cir.1980); Hausman v. Tredinnick, 432 F.Supp. 1160, 1162 (E.D.Pa.1977); Phillips v. Ward, 415 F.Supp. 976, 978 (E.D.Pa.1975).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Willie L. Adams and Roy Dancy v. Robert Gunnell, Warden, Federal Correctional Institution, Texarkana
See Jones, 433 U.S. at 127 n. 5, 97 S.Ct. at 2539 n. 5; see also Edwards v. White, 501 F.Supp. 8, 11-13 (M.D.Pa.1979), aff'd mem., 633 F.2d 209 (3d Cir.1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Walter H. Dyson v. W. J. Kocik, C. D. Rodgers, W. A. Adams, R. P. Weaverling, Lowell D. Hewitt, Mr. Polte
See, e.g., Edwards v. White, 501 F.Supp. 8, 13-14 (M.D.Pa.1979) (prison regulation at issue in the present case invalid as applied to possession of a petition), aff’d mem., 633 F.2d 209 (3d Cir. 1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Franklin v. Israel
See also Edwards v. White, 501 F.Supp. 8 (M.D.Pa.1979), aff’d 633 F.2d 209 (3d Cir. 1980) (notice informing inmate of charges and their underlying factual basis sufficient to meet Wolff standards).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Dolan
v.
Golla
v.
Golla
80-1161.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit.
Sep 16, 1980.
633 F.2d 209
Published
Citer courts: Third Circuit (1)
Dolan
v.
Golla
80-1161
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Third Circuit
9/16/80
M.D.Pa., 481 F.Supp. 475
AFFIRMED