United States v. Bonfiglio, 672 F.2d 901 (2d Cir. 1981). · Go Syfert
Search
United States v. Bonfiglio, 672 F.2d 901 (2d Cir. 1981). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
75 citation events (11 in the last 25 years) across 12 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Mishkin Ex Rel. Liquidation of the Business of Adler, Coleman Clearing Corp. v. Ensminger (In Re Adler, Coleman Clearing Corp.) (nysb, 1999-12-15)
Treatment trajectory · 1981 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1981 2003 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 13 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Mishkin Ex Rel. Liquidation of the Business of Adler, Coleman Clearing Corp. v. Ensminger (In Re Adler, Coleman Clearing Corp.)
Bankr. S.D.N.Y. · 1999 · signal: see · confidence high
See Zerman v. Jacobs, 510 F.Supp. 132, 135 (S.D.N.Y.) (“under § 29(b) of the Exchange Act, only unlawful contracts may be rescinded, not unlawful transactions made pursuant to lawful contracts”) (footnotes omitted), aff'd, 672 F.2d 901 (2d Cir.1981); Kidder Peabody & Co. v. Unigestion Int'l Ltd., 903 F.Supp. 479, 498 (S.D.N.Y.1995) (“contracts to purchase securities were induced through fraud in violation of the anti-fraud provisions of the Exchange Act, thus rendering those contracts ‘unlawful contracts’ under § 29”).
cited Cited "see" Deem v. Lockheed Corp.
S.D.N.Y. · 1989 · signal: see · confidence high
See Zerman v. Jacobs, 510 F.Supp. 132, 136 (S.D.N.Y.), aff'd mem., 672 F.2d 901 (2d Cir.1981); Buckley v. 112 Central Park South, 285 A.D. 331 , 136 N.Y.S.2d 233, 236 (1st Dep’t 1954).
cited Cited "see" Zerman v. Sullivan & Cromwell
S.D.N.Y. · 1988 · signal: see · confidence high
See Zerman v. Jacobs, 510 F.Supp. 132 (S.D.N.Y.1981) (Weinfeld, J.), aff'd without opinion, 672 F.2d 901 (2d Cir.1981); Prozeller Aff., sworn to October 22, 1984, 11 6. (2) “... she sued Hutton.
cited Cited "see" Nevitsky v. Manufacturers Hanover Brokerage Services
S.D.N.Y. · 1987 · signal: see · confidence high
See Zerman v. Jacobs, 510 F.Supp. 132, 134 (S.D.N.Y.), aff'd without opinion, 672 F.2d 901 (2d Cir.1981). 18 .
discussed Cited "see" Krome v. Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc.
S.D.N.Y. · 1986 · signal: see · confidence high
Implied Rights of Action, supra, 40 Wash. & Lee L.Rev. at 1085-86; see Schuyt v. Rowe Price Prime Reserve Fund, Inc., 622 F.Supp. 169, 176-77 (S.D.N.Y.1985). *918 An additional consideration is the “ ‘nature of the particular rule and its place in the regulatory scheme.’ ” Zerman v. Jacobs, 510 F.Supp. 132, 135 (S.D.N.Y.) (quoting Colonial Realty Corp. v. Bache & Co., 358 F.2d 178, 182 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 385 U.S. 817 , 87 S.Ct. 40 , 17 L.Ed.2d 56 (1966)), aff'd mem., 672 F.2d 901 (2d Cir. 1981).
cited Cited "see" Moran v. Kidder Peabody & Co.
S.D.N.Y. · 1985 · signal: see · confidence high
See Zerman v. Jacobs, 510 F.Supp. 132 ,135 n. 10 (S.D.N.Y.1981), affd, 672 F.2d 901 (2d Cir.1982); Schy v. Federal Deposit Ins.
cited Cited "see" Zerman v. Jacobs
2d Cir. · 1984 · signal: see · confidence high
See Zerman v. Jacobs, 510 F.Supp. 132 (S.D.N.Y.), aff'd, 672 F.2d 901 (2d Cir.1981).
cited Cited "see" Zerman v. Jacobs
2d Cir. · 1984 · signal: see · confidence high
See Zerman v. Jacobs, 510 F.Supp. 132 (S.D.N.Y.), aff'd, 672 F.2d 901 (2d Cir.1981).
cited Cited "see" Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 91,916 Evelyn Zerman v. Andrew J. Melton, Jr., Robert M. Gardiner, Peter Byrne and Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc.
2d Cir. · 1984 · signal: see · confidence high
See Zerman v. Jacobs, 510 F.Supp. 132 (S.D.N.Y.), aff'd mem. 672 F.2d 901 (2d Cir.1981); Zerman v. Cowen, 82 Civ. 1232 (S.D.N.Y.
discussed Cited "see" Evelyn ZERMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. George BALL, Robert Fomon, and E.F. Hutton & Company, Inc., Defendants-Appellees
2d Cir. · 1984 · signal: see · confidence high
See Zerman v. Jacobs, 510 F.Supp. 132, 134 (S.D.N.Y.), aff'd mem., 672 F.2d 901 (2d Cir.1981). 4 Indeed, it is perhaps significant that despite its assertions of fraud and reliance, nowhere does the complaint state that Zerman did not know these basic facts.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." NexPoint Diversified Real Est. Tr. v. Acis Cap. Mgmt., L.P.
2d Cir. · 2023 · signal: see also · confidence low
Omega, 2014 WL 3907082 , at *4 (collecting cases); see also Zerman v. Jacobs, 510 F. Supp. 132, 135 (S.D.N.Y.), aff’d, 672 F.2d 901 (2d Cir. 1981) (“[U]nder §29(b) of the Exchange Act, only unlawful contracts may be rescinded, not unlawful transactions made pursuant to lawful contracts.” (footnote omitted)).
cited Cited "see, e.g." Rhoades v. Powell
E.D. Cal. · 1986 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Zerman v. Jacobs, 510 F.Supp. 132, 135 (S.D.N.Y.), aff'd, 672 F.2d 901 (2d Cir.1981); Palmer v. Thomson & McKinnon Auchincloss, Inc., 474 F.Supp. 286, 291 (D.Conn.1979).
cited Cited "see, e.g." Lichter v. Paine, Webber, Jackson & Curtis, Inc.
N.D. Ill. · 1983 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Zerman v. Jacobs, 510 F.Supp. 132 (S.D.N.Y.), aff’d without opinion, 672 F.2d 901 (2d Cir.1981).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
United States
v.
Bonfiglio
81-1182.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.
Sep 17, 1981.
672 F.2d 901
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published

672 F.2d 901

U. S.
v.
Bonfiglio

81-1182

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Second Circuit

9/17/81

1

S.D.N.Y.

AFFIRMED