green
Positive treatment
1.9 score
Treatment trajectory · 1982 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1982
2004
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "but see"
Fischer v. Metcalf
But see Leedy v. Hartnett, 510 F. Supp. 1125 (M.D.Pa. 1981), aff'd, 676 F.2d 686 (3d Cir.1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Kleinknecht v. Gettysburg College
See Restatement (Second) of Torts § 328(B) (1965) (court determines whether facts give rise to any legal duty on part of defendant); accord Leedy v. Hartnett, 510 F.Supp. 1125 (M.D.Pa.1981), aff'd, 676 F.2d 686 (3d Cir.1982); Morena v. South Hills Health Sys., 501 Pa. 634 , 462 A.2d 680 (1983); see also Bradshaw v. Rawlings, 612 F.2d 135, 138 (3rd Cir.1979) (negligence claim must fail if based on circumstances for which law imposes no duty of care on defendant), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 909 , 100 S.Ct. 1836 , 64 L.Ed.2d 261 (1980); Boyce v. United States Steel Corp., 446 Pa. 226 , 285 A.2d 459,…
discussed
Cited "see"
Kleinknecht v. Gettysburg College
See Restatement (Second) of Torts § 328(B) (1965) (court determines whether facts give rise to any legal duty on part of defendant); accord Leedy v. Hartnett, 510 F.Supp. 1125 (M.D.Pa.1981), aff'd, 676 F.2d 686 (3d Cir.1982); Morena v. South Hills Health Sys., 501 Pa. 634 , 462 A.2d 680 (1983); see also Bradshaw v. Rawlings, 612 F.2d 135, 138 (3rd Cir.1979) (negligence claim must fail if based on circumstances for which law imposes no duty of care on defendant), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 909 , 100 S.Ct. 1836 , 64 L.Ed.2d 261 (1980); Boyce v. United States Steel Corp., 446 Pa. 226 , 285 A.2d 459,…
cited
Cited "see"
Schering Corp. v. Schering Aktiengesellschaft
See Koppers Company, Inc. v. Krupp-Koppers GmbH, 517 F.Supp. 836 (W.D.Pa.1981), aff'd, 676 F.2d 686 (3d Cir.1982); Grotrian, Helfferich, Schulz, Th.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Keystone Mushroom Sales, Inc., Appeal Of
81-1878.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit.
Feb 3, 1982.
676 F.2d 686
Published
Keystone Mushroom Sales, Inc., Appeal of
81-1878
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Third Circuit
2/3/82
1
E.D.Pa.
APPEAL DISMISSED