green
Positive treatment
3.9 score
Treatment trajectory · 1982 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1982
2004
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Donald W. Geib, D/B/A Rochester Colonial Amoco v. Amoco Oil Company, a Maryland Corporation
See Smith v. Atlantic Richfield Co., 533 F.Supp. 264, 267 (E.D.Pa.1982), aff'd, 692 F.2d 749 (3d Cir.1982) (no preemption of state franchise law as applied to convenience store franchise).
cited
Cited "see"
Millett v. Union Oil Company Of California
See Smith v. Atlantic Richfield Co., 533 F.Supp. 264, 267 (E.D.Pa.1982), aff'd, 692 F.2d 749 (3rd Cir.1982).
cited
Cited "see"
Millett v. Union Oil Co. of California
See Smith v. Atlantic Richfield Co., 533 F.Supp. 264, 267 (E.D.Pa. 1982), aff'd, 692 F.2d 749 (3rd Cir.1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Aurigemma v. Arco Petroleum Products Co.
See Smith v. Atlantic Richfield Co., 533 F.Supp. 264, 267 (E.D.Pa.1982), aff'd mem., 692 F.2d 749 (3d Cir.1983) (termination of AM/PM franchise was not brought within scope of PMPA by interrelation of AM/PM franchise agreement and premises lease).
cited
Cited "see"
Roberts v. Florida East Coast Railway Co.
See Loose v. Consolidated Rail Corp., 534 F.Supp. 260 (E.D.Pa.), aff'd, 692 F.2d 749 (3d Cir.1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Barnes v. Gulf Oil Corp.
See Smith v. Atlantic Richfield Co., 533 F.Supp. 264, 269 (E.D.Pa.), aff'd, 692 F.2d 749 (3d Cir.1982); Sexe v. Husky Oil Co., 475 F.Supp. 135, 137 (D.Mont.1979); Califonia Arco Distributors, Inc. v. Atlantic Richfield Co., 158 Cal.App.3d 349, 365 , 204 Cal.Rptr. 743, 754 (Cal.Ct.App.1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Barnes v. Gulf Oil Corporation
See Smith v. Atlantic Richfield Co., 533 F.Supp. 264, 269 (E.D.Pa.), aff'd, 692 F.2d 749 (3d Cir.1982); Sexe v. Husky Oil Co., 475 F.Supp. 135, 137 (D.Mont.1979); California Arco Distributors, Inc. v. Atlantic Richfield Co., 158 Cal.App.3d 349, 365 , 204 Cal.Rptr. 743, 754 (Cal.Ct.App.1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Aurigemma v. Arco Petroleum Products Co.
See, e.g., Smith v. Atlantic Richfield Co., 533 F.Supp. 264 (E.D.Pa.), aff'd, 692 F.2d 749 (3d Cir.1982) (AM/PM Convenience Store Agreement not a secondary agreement essential to plaintiff's motor fuel franchise).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Oliver
v.
Balzer
v.
Balzer
81-2604.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit.
Sep 27, 1982.
692 F.2d 749
Published
Oliver
v.
Balzer
81-2604
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Third Circuit
9/27/82
1
W.D.Pa.
AFFIRMED