In Re Special Grand Jury 81-1 (Leon D. Harvey), Alexandria Bar Ass'n, Amicus Curiae. Nat'l Ass'n of Crim. Def. Lawyers, Inc., Amicus Curiae. Am. Civil Liberties Union of Virginia, Amicus Curiae. Legal Comm. for the Nat'l Org. for Reform of Marijuana Laws, Amicus Curiae, 697 F.2d 112 (4th Cir. 1982). · Go Syfert
Search
In Re Special Grand Jury 81-1 (Leon D. Harvey), Alexandria Bar Ass'n, Amicus Curiae. Nat'l Ass'n of Crim. Def. Lawyers, Inc., Amicus Curiae. Am. Civil Liberties Union of Virginia, Amicus Curiae. Legal Comm. for the Nat'l Org. for Reform of Marijuana Laws, Amicus Curiae, 697 F.2d 112 (4th Cir. 1982). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
67 citation events (1 in the last 25 years) across 18 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Chevron Corporation v. Aaron Page (ca4, 2014-09-24)
Treatment trajectory · 1982 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1982 2004 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 14 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited as authority (rule) Chevron Corporation v. Aaron Page
4th Cir. · 2014 · confidence medium
The opinion that they cite in support, In re Special Grand Jury No. 81-1 (Harvey), 676 F.2d 1005, 1008 (4th Cir. 1982), was later withdrawn, In re Harvey, 697 F.2d 112, 112 (4th Cir. 1982).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Beatriz Corporan-Cuevas, United States of America v. Victor Milanes-Castellano
4th Cir. · 1994 · signal: see · confidence high
See In re Harvey, 697 F.2d 112 (4th Cir.1982).
cited Cited "see" In Re Grand Jury Matter Number 86-525-5
E.D. Pa. · 1988 · signal: see · confidence high
See In Re Special Grand Jury No. 81-1 (Leon D. *459 Harvey), 697 F.2d 112 (4th Cir.1982).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Ricks
4th Cir. · 1985 · signal: see · confidence high
See In re Special Grand Jury, 676 F.2d 1005, 1009 (4 Cir.), vacated on other grounds, 697 F.2d 112 (4 Cir.1982) (in banc).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Thomas Calvin Ricks, A/K/A Joe Dancer, United States of America v. James A. Carter, United States of America v. Marcell Moffatt, A/K/A Black Barney, United States of America v. Stanley Rodgers, United States of America v. Kerney William Lindsey, A/K/A Wilco, United States of America v. Clifton Leo Frisby, United States of America v. Beatrice Roberts, United States of America v. Maurice David King, A/K/A Peanut
4th Cir. · 1985 · signal: see · confidence high
See In re Special Grand Jury, 676 F.2d 1005, 1009 (4 Cir.), vacated on other grounds, 697 F.2d 112 (4 Cir.1982) (in banc).
discussed Cited "see" In Re Grand Jury Proceedings, John Doe (Arnold Weiner, Doe's Attorney). John Doe v. United States (2×)
6th Cir. · 1985 · signal: see · confidence high
See In re Special Grand Jury 81 — 1 (Harvey), 697 F.2d 112 (4th Cir.1982) (en banc), vacating In re Special Grand Jury No. 81-1 (Harvey), 676 F.2d 1005 (4th Cir.1982).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Whitehouse v. USDC for RI
1st Cir. · 1995 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also United States v. Diozzi, 807 F.2d 10 , 12-13 ________ _____________ ______ (1st Cir. 1986) ("[A]ttorneys [can]not serve the dual roles of defense counsel and sworn government witnesses in the same trial."). -11- subpoena may cause client to distrust attorney and terminate relationship), rev'd on other grounds, 697 F.2d 112 (4th Cir. ________________________ 1982) (en banc).8 The central question on appeal in this case is whether the United States District Court for Rhode Island has the power to adopt a local rule that requires a federal prosecutor, at either the grand jury or trial st…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Sheldon Whitehouse, in His Official Capacity as United States Attorney for the District of Rhode Island v. United States District Court for the District of Rhode Island, Sheldon Whitehouse, in His Official Capacity as United States Attorney for the District of Rhode Island v. Supreme Court of Rhode Island, Acting Chief Justice Joseph R. Weisberger, Florence K. Murray, Donald F. Shea, Victoria Lederberg and David D. Curtain, as Acting Chief Disciplinary Counsel, Sheldon Whitehouse, in His Official Capacity as United States Attorney for the District of Rhode Island v. United States District Court for the District of Rhode Island
1st Cir. · 1995 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., In re Special Grand Jury No. 81-1, 676 F.2d 1005, 1009 (4th Cir.1982) (issuance of subpoena may cause client to distrust attorney and terminate relationship), rev'd on other grounds, 697 F.2d 112 (4th Cir.1982) (en banc). 8 16 The central question on appeal in this case is whether the United States District Court for Rhode Island has the power to adopt a local rule that requires a federal prosecutor, at either the grand jury or trial stage, to obtain judicial approval before serving a subpoena on counsel to compel evidence concerning a client.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Whitehouse v. United States District Court
1st Cir. · 1995 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., In re Special Grand Jury No. 81-1, 676 F.2d 1005, 1009 (4th Cir.1982) (issuance of subpoena may cause client to distrust attorney and terminate relationship), rev’d on other grounds, 697 F.2d 112 (4th Cir.1982) (en banc). 8 The central question on appeal in this case is whether the United States District Court for Rhode Island has the power to adopt a local rule that requires a federal prosecutor, at either the grand jury or trial stage, to obtain judicial approval before serving a subpoena on counsel to compel evidence concerning a client.
cited Cited "see, e.g." In Re Grand Jury Proceedings 88-9 (Mia). Appeal of Jerald Newton, John Doe
11th Cir. · 1990 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence medium
See, e.g., In re Special Grand Jury Number 81-1 (Harvey), 676 F.2d 1005 , vacated 697 F.2d 112, 113 (4th Cir. 1982) (opinion vacated because Harvey became a fugitive).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." In Re Grand Jury Proceedings, Appeal of Carol Hill
1st Cir. · 1986 · signal: compare · confidence low
(Slotnick), 781 F.2d 238, 243-49 (2d Cir. en banc, 1986) (neither 5th nor 6th Amendment mandates "need & relevance” showing before subpoena against attorney of unindicted target can be enforced); In the Matter of Klein, 776 F.2d 628, 632-34 (7th Cir.1985) (6th Amendment does not mandate test before subpoena against attorneys for grand jury witnesses can be enforced); In re Grand Jury Subpoena (Battle), 748 F.2d 327, 329-30 (6th Cir.1984) (Fourth Amendment requires no showing of relevancy before witness can be forced to produce records); In re Grand Jury Proceeding (Schofield), 721 F.2d 1221 …
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Klubock
D. Mass. · 1986 · signal: see also · confidence low
It has thus been held that it is within the court’s supervisory power to protect against such grand jury abuses as undue *120 harassment, Branzburg, 408 U.S. at 707-05 . 92 S.Ct. at 2669-70 , impeding a defense attorney’s ability to prepare an effective defense for his or her client, In re Grand Jury Matters, 751 F.2d 13 (1st Cir.1984); see also In re Grand Jury Subpoena (Legal Services Center), 615 F.Supp. 958 (D.Mass.1985), post-indictment attempts to gather evidence, In re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum, dated January 2, 1985 (Simels), 767 F.2d 26 (S.D.N.Y.1985), and unnecessary interf…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." In Re Grand Jury Subpoena Served Upon John Doe, Esq., Richard Roe, Intervenor-Appellant v. United States (2×)
2d Cir. · 1985 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., In re Special Grand Jury No. 81-1 (Leon Harvey), 676 F.2d 1005, 1008 (4th Cir.), vacated and withdrawn when grand jury indicted target and he became fugitive, 697 F.2d 112 (4th Cir.1982) (en banc); In re Grand Jury Proceedings (Jeffrey Fine), 641 F.2d 199 (5th Cir.1981); In re Grand Jury Proceedings (Gary Katz), 623 F.2d 122 (2d Cir.1980); In re November 1979 Grand Jury, 616 F.2d 1021 (7th Cir.1980); In re Grand Jury Proceedings (Appeal of FMC Corp.), 604 F.2d 798 (3d Cir.1979); Velsicol Chemical Corp. v. Parsons, 561 F.2d 671 (7th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 942 (1978).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." In Re Grand Jury Matters, Appeal of United States of America
1st Cir. · 1984 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also In re Special Grand Jury No. 81-1 (Harvey), 676 F.2d 1005, 1010 (4th Cir.), vacated on other grounds, 697 F.2d 112 (4th Cir.1982); In re Grand Jury Proceedings (Schofield), 486 F.2d 85, 90 (3d Cir.1973).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
In Re Special Grand Jury 81-1 (Leon D. Harvey), Alexandria Bar Association, Amicus Curiae. National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, Inc., Amicus Curiae. American Civil Liberties Union of Virginia, Amicus Curiae. Legal Committee for the National Organization for Reform of Marijuana Laws, Amicus Curiae
81-2187.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.
Oct 7, 1982.
697 F.2d 112
Cited by 17 opinions  |  Published

697 F.2d 112

In re Special Grand Jury 81-1 (Leon D. HARVEY), Petitioner.
Alexandria Bar Association, Amicus Curiae.
National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, Inc.,
Amicus Curiae.
American Civil Liberties Union of Virginia, Amicus Curiae.
Legal Committee for the National Organization for Reform of
Marijuana Laws, Amicus Curiae.

No. 81-2187.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fourth Circuit.

Argued Oct. 7, 1982.
Decided Oct. 7, 1982.

William B. Moffitt, Alexandria, Va. (Nina J. Ginsberg, Mark & Moffitt, P.C., Alexandria, Va., on brief), for appellant.

William G. Otis, Sp. Asst. U.S. Atty., Alexandria, Va. (Elsie L. Munsell, U.S. Atty., Alexandria, Va., on brief), for appellee.

James C. Clark, Land & Clark, Alexandria, Va., on brief, for the Alexandria Bar Ass'n as amicus curiae.

James W. Lawson, Oteri & Weinberg, Boston, Mass., Gerald H. Goldstein, Goldstein & Goldstein, San Antonio, Tex., James K. Jenkins, Stroup, Jenkins & Goldstein, Atlanta, Ga., on brief, for the Nat. Ass'n of Crim. Defense Lawyers as amicus curiae.

Victor M. Glasberg, Alexandria, Va., for American Civil Liberties Union of Virginia as amicus curiae.

Al Horn, Atlanta, Ga., Kevin Zeese, Washington, D.C., on brief, for the Legal Committee of the Nat. Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws as amicus curiae.

Before WINTER, BUTZNER, RUSSELL, WIDENER, HALL, PHILLIPS, MURNAGHAN, SPROUSE, ERVIN and CHAPMAN, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

1

The court being advised that the target of the investigation, Leon D. Harvey, conducted by the above-entitled grand jury, has been indicted and is a fugitive from justice, it is ORDERED:

2

1. The above-entitled appeal be and it is hereby dismissed with leave to said target, for good cause shown, to move to reinstate such appeal if he surrenders himself to federal custody before the expiration of thirty days from the date of this order.

3

2. The panel opinions heretofore filed be and they are hereby withdrawn, 676 F.2d 1005.