Craftsman Serv. Ctr., Inc., in Re, 697 F.2d 289 (2d Cir. 1982). · Go Syfert
Search
Craftsman Serv. Ctr., Inc., in Re, 697 F.2d 289 (2d Cir. 1982). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
87 citation events (21 in the last 25 years) across 14 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Miller v. Esper (nysd, 2021-03-31)
Treatment trajectory · 1982 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1982 2004 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 12 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" Miller v. Esper
S.D.N.Y. · 2021 · signal: see · confidence high
See Chodos v. FBI, 559 F. Supp. 69, 72 (S.D.N.Y. 1982), aff’d, 697 F.2d 289 (2d Cir. 1982).
cited Cited "see" Lipscombe v. Ridley
D.D.C. · 1991 · signal: see · confidence high
See Chodos v. F.B.I., 559 F.Supp. 69 (S.D.N.Y.1982), aff'd 697 F.2d 289 (2nd Cir.1982).
discussed Cited "see" Kingsley v. Bureau of Prisons
2d Cir. · 1991 · signal: see · confidence high
See Chodos v. Federal Bureau of Investigation, 559 F.Supp. 69, 72 (S.D.N.Y. 1982) aff'd, 697 F.2d 289 (2d Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1111 , 103 S.Ct. 741 , 74 L.Ed.2d 962 (1983); see also Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of the Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 456 F.2d 1339, 1346 (2d Cir.1972) (on remand). .
discussed Cited "see" Kingsley v. Bureau of Prisons
2d Cir. · 1991 · signal: see · confidence high
See Chodos v. Federal Bureau of Investigation, 559 F.Supp. 69, 72 (S.D.N.Y. 1982) aff'd, 697 F.2d 289 (2d Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1111 , 103 S.Ct. 741 , 74 L.Ed.2d 962 (1983); see also Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of the Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 456 F.2d 1339, 1346 (2d Cir.1972) (on remand) 5 We note that challenges to the length, appropriateness or conditions of confinement are properly brought under 28 U.S.C.
cited Cited "see" Texaco, Inc. v. Pennzoil, Co.
Tex. App. · 1987 · signal: see · confidence high
Id.; see Chromalloy American Corp. v. Universal Housing Systems of America, Inc., 495 F.Supp. 544, 550 (S.D.N.Y.1980), aff'd, 697 F.2d 289 (2d Cir.1982).
discussed Cited "see" Unker v. Joseph Markovits, Inc.
S.D.N.Y. · 1986 · signal: see · confidence high
Initially, defendants argued that Unker’s complaint failed to state any claim for defamation, since it failed to satisfy the basic pleading requirement that ”[i]n an action for libel or slander, the particular words complained of shall be set forth in the complaint.” N.Y.C.P.L.R. § 3016(a); see Chodos v. FBI, 559 F.Supp. 69, 75 (S.D.N.Y.1982), aff’d mem., 697 F.2d 289 (2d Cir.1982).
discussed Cited "see" Washington v. James
2d Cir. · 1986 · signal: see · confidence high
Fed.R.Civ.P. 15(a); see Chodos v. F.B.I., 559 F.Supp. 69 , 70 n. 2 (S.D.N.Y.), aff'd, 697 F.2d 289 (2d Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1111 , 103 S.Ct. 741 , 74 L.Ed.2d 962 (1983) (motion to dismiss not a “responsive pleading” for Rule 15 purposes).
discussed Cited "see" Washington v. James
2d Cir. · 1986 · signal: see · confidence high
Fed.R.Civ.P. 15(a); see Chodos v. F.B.I., 559 F.Supp. 69 , 70 n. 2 (S.D.N.Y.), aff'd, 697 F.2d 289 (2d Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1111 , 103 S.Ct. 741 , 74 L.Ed.2d 962 (1983) (motion to dismiss not a "responsive pleading" for Rule 15 purposes). 15 Although stated in less than artful words, the pro se complaint as amended can reasonably be read to allege that state prison officials intentionally violated Washington's right of reasonable access to the courts, see Bounds v. Smith, 430 U.S. at 821 , 97 S.Ct. at 1494 , and his right to receive and send legal mail, see Heimerle v. Attorney Ge…
discussed Cited "see" Fustok v. Conticommodity Services, Inc.
S.D.N.Y. · 1984 · signal: see · confidence high
See Chromalloy American Corp. v. Universal Housing Systems of America, Inc., 495 F.Supp. 544, 550 (S.D.N.Y.1980), aff'd mem., 697 F.2d 289 (2d Cir.1982) (whether parties intended to be bound only by a written agreement is issue of fact for trial). 33 . 470 F.2d 767, 773 (2d Cir.1972). 34 .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." R.G. Group, Inc., and R.G. Restaurant Associates v. The Horn & Hardart Company, and Bojangles' of America, Inc.
2d Cir. · 1984 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Chromalloy American Corp. v. Universal Housing Systems of America, Inc., 495 F.Supp. 544, 550 (S.D.N.Y.1980) (finding no oral contract under New York law when “correspondence between the parties not only refers to a written agreement, but expressly disclaims any intention to be bound until the execution of such a document”), aff'd mem., 697 F.2d 289 (2d Cir.1982); Ashton v. Chrysler Corp., 261 f.Supp. 1009 (E.D.N.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Stratford Group, Ltd. v. Interstate Bakeries Corp.
S.D.N.Y. · 1984 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Chromalloy American Corp. v. Universal Housing Systems of America, Inc., 495 F.Supp. 544, 549 (S.D.N.Y.1980), aff'd, 697 F.2d 289 (2d Cir. 1982); Allen Chase & Co. v. White, Weld & Co., 311 F.Supp. 1253, 1260 (S.D.N.Y. 1970); Steinbeck v. Gerosa, supra, 175 N.Y.S.2d at 13 , 151 N.E.2d at 178 .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 99,667 Reprosystem, B v. and N. Norman Muller, and Cross-Appellants v. Scm Corporation, and Cross-Appellee
2d Cir. · 1984 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Chromalloy American Corp. v. Universal Housing Systems, 495 F.Supp. 544 (S.D.N.Y.1980), aff'd mem., 697 F.2d 289 (2d Cir.1982) (offer to purchase conditioned on execution of written contract held sufficient to show intent not to be bound prior to signing); Scheck v. Francis, 26 N.Y.2d 466 , 311 N.Y.S.2d 841 , 260 N.E.2d 493 (1970) (transmittal letter showed intent not to be bound until contract signed).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Craftsman Service Center, Inc., in Re
82-3028_1.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.
Jul 14, 1982.
697 F.2d 289
Published

697 F.2d 289

Craftsman Service Center, Inc., In re

82-3028

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Second Circuit

7/14/82

1

S.D.N.Y.

MANDAMUS DENIED