green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
6.6 score
G Cite
Treatment trajectory · 1982 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1982
2004
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 9 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Lindy R. Urso v. Mohammad
ny right of indemnity which a state employee might have against the state following a judgment against the employee in his or her personal capacity is distinct, however, from a claim brought directly against the state.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Hong Kong Entertainment (Overseas) Investment, Ltd. v. Perez
consideration of the cover letter does not, therefore, violate the parol evidence rule 3 because the cover letter is part of the contract.
cited
Cited "see"
Otokoyama Co. Ltd. v. Wine of Japan Import, Inc.
See Seiko Sporting Goods U.S.A., Inc. v. Tokeiten, 545 F.Supp. 221, 226 (S.D.N.Y.1982), aff'd, 697 F.2d 296 (2d Cir.1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Wright v. National Bank of Stamford
See Ragosta v. Vermont, 556 F.Supp. 220, 225-26 (D.Vt.1981), aff'd mem., 697 F.2d 296 (2d Cir.1982); Kovacs v. Goodman, 383 F.Supp. 507, 509 (E.D.Pa.1974), aff 'd mem., 515 F.2d 507 (3d Cir. *1299 1975); Kregger v. Posner, 248 F.Supp. 804, 806 (E.D.Mich.1966).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Milgrom v. Burstein
In Kelm , the Court gave a lengthy examination of the law regarding what qualifies for being a “state actor” and found that even when a person uses an unconstitutional state statute, that action “by a private party pursuant to the statute, without something more, was not enough to justify a characterization of that party as a ‘state actor.’ ” Id. at 422 (citing Lugar v. Edmondson Oil Co., 457 U.S. 922, 939 , 102 S.Ct. 2744 , 73 L.Ed.2d 482 (1982)); see also, Ragosta v. State of Vermont, 556 F.Supp. 220 (D.Vt.1982), aff'd, 697 F.2d 296 (2d Cir.1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Friedman v. Arizona World Nurseries Ltd. Partnership
Todd v. Oppehheimer & Co., Inc., 78 F.R.D. 415, 420-21 (S.D.N.Y.1978); see also Posner v. Coopers & Lybrand, 92 F.R.D. 765, 769 (S.D.N.Y.1981), aff'd, 697 F.2d 296 (2d Cir.1982); Fidenas A.G. v. Honeywell, Inc., 501 F.Supp. 1029 (S.D.N.Y.1980); Gross v. Diversified Mortg.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Tobias v. First City National Bank & Trust Co.
See also Posner v. Coopers & Lybrand, 92 F.R.D. 765, 769 (S.D.N.Y.1981), aff'd, 697 F.2d 296 (2d Cir.1982); Fidenas A.G. v. Honeywell, Inc., 501 F.Supp. 1029 (S.D.N.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
V & v. Food Products, Inc. v. Cacique Cheese Co.
Anheuser-Busch Inc. v. Stroh Brewery Co., 750 F.2d 631, 642 (8th Cir.1984) (district court correct in not ascribing weight to whether the term “LA” was generic for low alcohol beer in Australia); see also Seiko Sporting Goods USA, Inc. v. Kabushiki Kaisha Hattori Tokeiten, 545 F.Supp. 221, 226 (S.D.N.Y.), aff'd, 697 F.2d 296 (2d Cir.1982). 5 “The descriptiveness of the term is determined from the viewpoint of the relevant purchasing public.” In re Northland Aluminum Prods., Inc., 777 F.2d 1556, 1559 (Fed.Cir.1985).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Reingold v. Deloitte Haskins & Sells
See also Posner v. Coopers & Lybrand, 92 F.R.D. 765, 769-70 (S.D.N.Y.1981), aff'd without opinion, 697 F.2d 296 (2nd Cir.1982).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Schaefer
v.
American M-A-N Corp
v.
American M-A-N Corp
81-7901.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.
May 3, 1982.
697 F.2d 296
Published
Citer courts: D. Connecticut (1) · Northern Mariana Islands (1)
Schaefer
v.
American M-A-N Corp.
81-7901
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Second Circuit
5/3/82
1
S.D.N.Y.
AFFIRMED