United States v. Levino Michelena-Orovio, 706 F.2d 502 (5th Cir. 1983). · Go Syfert
Search
United States v. Levino Michelena-Orovio, 706 F.2d 502 (5th Cir. 1983). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
8 citation events across 3 distinct courts.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Levino MICHELENA-OROVIO, Defendant-Appellant
81-3706.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.
May 18, 1983.
706 F.2d 502
Dymond, Crull & Castaing, Edward J. Castaing, New Orleans, La., for defendant-appellant., John Volz, U.S. Atty., Marilyn Barnes, Michael Schatzow, Asst. U.S. Attys., New Orleans, La., for plaintiff-appellee.
Published
Reporter's Syllabus — editorial summary, not part of the Court's opinion

Dymond, Crull & Castaing, Edward J. Castaing, New Orleans, La., for defendant-appellant.

John Volz, U.S. Atty., Marilyn Barnes, Michael Schatzow, Asst. U.S. Attys., New Orleans, La., for plaintiff-appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana, Frederick J.R. Heebe, Chief Judge.

ON SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC.

(Opinion March 25, 1983, 5 Cir., 1982, 702 F.2d 496)

Before CLARK, Chief Judge, BROWN, WISDOM, GEE, RUBIN, REAVLEY, POLITZ, RANDALL, TATE, JOHNSON, WILLIAMS, GARWOOD, JOLLY and HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judges.

Rehearing

ON SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC.

(Opinion March 25, 1983, 5 Cir., 1982, 702 F.2d 496)

Before CLARK, Chief Judge, BROWN, WISDOM, GEE, RUBIN, REAVLEY, POL-ITZ, RANDALL, TATE, JOHNSON, WILLIAMS, GARWOOD, JOLLY and HIGGIN-BOTHAM, Circuit Judges.

Lead Opinion

BY THE COURT:

A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the application for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that the cause shall be reheard by the Court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.