green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
4.8 score
“n ambassador's actions under color of authority do not, as a matter of law, automatically bind the state that he represents.”
Treatment trajectory · 1983 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1983
2004
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Themis Capital, LLC v. Democratic Republic of Congo
n ambassador's actions under color of authority do not, as a matter of law, automatically bind the state that he represents.
discussed
Cited "see"
AGIP U.S.A., INC. VS. THE PULLMAN COMPANY (L-3530-10, UNION COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)
See Gen'l Overseas Films, Ltd. v. Robin Int'l, Inc., 542 F.Supp. 684 (S.D.N.Y. 1982) (rejecting claim of apparent authority, as purported agent's execution of a guarantee by one corporation for the debt of an unrelated corporation "was extraordinary and thus sufficient to require inquiry"), aff'd o.b., 718 F.2d 1085 (2d Cir. 1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Fdic v. Providence College
See General Overseas Films, Ltd. v. Robin Int'l, Inc., 542 F.Supp. 684, 690 (S.D.N.Y.1982) (Sofaer, J.), aff'd, 718 F.2d 1085 (2d Cir.1983). 30 Crossland bears the burden of establishing that the transaction was neither extraordinary nor novel.
cited
Cited "see"
FDIC v. Providence College
See General Overseas Films, Ltd. v. Robin Int'l, Inc., 542 F.Supp. 684, 690 (S.D.N.Y.1982) (Sofaer, J.), aff'd, 718 F.2d 1085 (2d Cir.1983).
cited
Cited "see"
In Re Thomson McKinnon Securities, Inc.
See General Overseas Films, Ltd. v. Robin International, Inc., 542 F.Supp. 684, 690 (S.D.N.Y.1982), aff'd, 718 F.2d 1085 (2d Cir.1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Jones Motor Co., Inc. v. Teledyne, Inc.
See General Overseas Films, Ltd. v. Robin Intern., Inc., 542 F.Supp. 684 (S.D.N.Y. 1982), aff'd, 718 F.2d 1085 (2nd Cir.1983) (a guaranty is “collateral to the debt itself.”); Financeamerica, Etc. v. Harvey E.
discussed
Cited "see"
Banque Worms v. Luis A. Duque Pena E Hijos, Ltda.
See General Overseas Films, Ltd. v. Robin International, Inc., 542 F.Supp. 684 (S.D.N.Y.1982), aff' d, 718 F.2d 1085 (2d Cir. 1983); Greene v. Hellman, 51 N.Y.2d 197 , 412 N.E.2d 1301 , 433 N.Y.S.2d 75 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Utica Mutual Insurance v. Fireman's Fund Insurance
See Ford v. Unity Hospital, 32 N.Y.2d 464, 470, 472-73 , 299 N.E.2d 659, 664 , 346 N.Y.S.2d 238, 244 (1973) (“The mere creation of an agency for some purpose does not automatically invest the agent with ‘apparent authority’ to bind the principal without limitation____”) (citations omitted); Lee v. Jenkins Brothers, 268 F.2d 357, 365 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 361 U.S. 913 , 80 S.Ct. 257 , 4 L.Ed.2d 183 (1959) (company president “only has authority to bind his company by acts arising in the usual and regular course of business but not for contracts of an ‘extraordinary’ nature.”) …
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Construction Exporting Enterprises, Uneca
v.
Nikki Maritime Ltd
v.
Nikki Maritime Ltd
82-7823.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.
Jan 31, 1983.
Published
Citer courts: S.D. New York (1)
Construction Exporting Enterprises, Uneca
v.
Nikki Maritime Ltd.
82-7823
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Second Circuit
1/31/83
1
S.D.N.Y.
REMANDED