Pacemaker Diagnostic Clinic of Am., Inc., a Tennessee Corp., Cross-Appellee v. Instromedix, Inc., an Oregon Corp., Cross-Appellant, 718 F.2d 971 (9th Cir. 1983). · Go Syfert
Search
Pacemaker Diagnostic Clinic of Am., Inc., a Tennessee Corp., Cross-Appellee v. Instromedix, Inc., an Oregon Corp., Cross-Appellant, 718 F.2d 971 (9th Cir. 1983). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
13 citation events across 5 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Clark v. Kahn (In Re Dlott) (mab, 1983-12-19)
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Clark v. Kahn (In Re Dlott)
Bankr. D. Mass. · 1983 · signal: see · confidence high
However, because I also find that the matters raised herein are such that this Court may not enter a final order, Northern Pipeline Construction Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Company, 458 U.S. 50 , 102 S.Ct. 2858 , 73 L.Ed.2d 598 (1982); see Pacemaker Diagnostic Clinic of America, Inc. v. Instromedix Inc., 712 F.2d 1305 (9th Cir.1983), rehearing en banc granted (1983) 718 F.2d 971 , this Court’s Memorandum and proposed Order will be submitted to a United States District Judge for the District of Massachusetts for consideration consistent with this Court’s limited jurisdiction.
cited Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Janet Woodley
9th Cir. · 1984 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Pacemaker Diagnostic Clinic of America, Inc. v. Instromedix, Inc., 712 F.2d 1305 (9th Cir.1983), reh’g en banc granted, 718 F.2d 971 (9th Cir.1983).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Pacemaker Diagnostic Clinic of America, Inc., a Tennessee Corporation, Cross-Appellee
v.
Instromedix, Inc., an Oregon Corporation, Cross-Appellant
82-3152.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
Oct 20, 1983.
718 F.2d 971
Published

718 F.2d 971

PACEMAKER DIAGNOSTIC CLINIC OF AMERICA, INC., a Tennessee
Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant, Cross-Appellee,
v.
INSTROMEDIX, INC., an Oregon Corporation,
Defendant-Appellee, Cross-Appellant.

Nos. 82-3152, 82-3182.

United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.

Oct. 20, 1983.

J. Pierre Kolisch, Kolisch, Hartwell, Dickinson & Stuart, Portland, Or., for defendant-appellee, cross-appellant.

Sherman O. Parrett, Cushman, Darby & Cushman, Washington, D.C., for plaintiff-appellant, cross-appellee.

Before BROWNING, Chief Judge, CHOY, GOODWIN, WALLACE, SNEED, KENNEDY, ANDERSON, HUG, TANG, SKOPIL, SCHROEDER, FLETCHER, FARRIS, PREGERSON, ALARCON, POOLE, FERGUSON, NELSON, CANBY, BOOCHEVER, NORRIS, and REINHARDT, Circuit Judges.ORDER

1

Upon the vote of a majority of the regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that this case be reheard by an en banc panel of the court pursuant to Rule 25 of the Rules of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The previous three-judge panel assignment, 712 F.2d 1305 (9th Cir.1983) is withdrawn.

2

Oral argument in the above case will be held in San Francisco, on Tuesday, November 15, 1983, at 1:30 p.m.