Rocket Indus., Inc. v. Gauthier Tire & Recapping Co., Inc, 720 F.2d 658 (1st Cir. 1983). · Go Syfert
Search
Rocket Indus., Inc. v. Gauthier Tire & Recapping Co., Inc, 720 F.2d 658 (1st Cir. 1983). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
G Cite
cited 3× by 1 distinct case · “In ‘our system of representative litigation ... each party is deemed bound by the acts of his lawyer-agent ____’ ”
60 citation events (7 in the last 25 years) across 17 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Juan Rivera-Muriente v. Juan Agosto-Alicea (ca1, 1992-03-23)
Treatment trajectory · 1983 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1983 2004 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 13 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Juan Rivera-Muriente v. Juan Agosto-Alicea
1st Cir. · 1992 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
t is only necessary for the plaintiff in an employment situation to be effectively notified of a discharge for the cause of action to accrue at the time of notification.
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Hay v. Wells Cargo, Inc.
D. Nev. · 1984 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
in 'our system of representative litigation ... each party is deemed bound by the acts of his lawyer-agent ____
cited Cited "see" Catherine J. Clay v. Commissioner
Tax Ct. · 2018 · signal: see · confidence high
See Nordberg v. Commissioner, 79 T.C. 655, 664 (1982), aff’d without published opinion, 720 F.2d 658 (1st Cir. 1983).
discussed Cited "see" Horney v. Westfield Gage Co.
D. Mass. · 2002 · signal: see · confidence high
See E.E.O.C. v. State of Rhode Island, 549 F.Supp. 60 , 67 (D.R.I.1982) (noting that the similarity of effort may be measured by the physical or mental exertion needed for particular jobs), aff'd, 720 F.2d 658 (1st Cir.1983).
discussed Cited "see" Andrews v. Arkwright Mutual Insurance
Mass. Super. Ct. · 1994 · signal: see · confidence high
See Leite v. Kennecott Copper Corp., 558 F.Supp. 1170, 1173 (D.Mass. 1983), aff'd, 720 F.2d 658 (1st Cir. 1983) (court granted summary judgment for defendant who, while represented by counsel, failed to meet period of limitation even though E.E.O.C. represented there was “no problem” with the period of limitation); Needham v. Beecham, Inc., 515 F.Supp. 460, 467-68 (D.Maine 1981) (court did not apply equitable tolling because plaintiff retained counsel, even though he had been misled by a Department of Labor Compliance officer); Otstott v. Verex Assurance, Inc., 481 F.Supp. 1269, 1271 (N.D.
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Reed
W.D. Ark. · 1994 · signal: see · confidence high
See Leite v. Kennecott Copper Corp., 558 F.Supp. 1170 , 1173 n. 1 (D.Mass.1983) (“this tolling provision applies only to the conciliation efforts preceding the institution of legal action by the Secretary, not to those that might precede a private civil action”), aff'd, 720 F.2d 658 (1st Cir.1984); Hovey v. Lutheran Medical Center, 516 F.Supp. 554, 556-557 (E.D.N.Y.1981) (“Under section 626(d) an individual need not exhaust the possibilities of conciliation before commencing action; he merely must give the Secretary sixty days to reach a settlement.
discussed Cited "see" Wiehoff v. GTE Directories Corp.
D. Minnesota · 1993 · signal: see · confidence high
See Leite v. Kennecott Copper Corp., 558 F.Supp. 1170 , 1173 n. 1 (D.Mass.1983) ("this tolling provision applies only to the conciliation efforts preceding the institution of legal action by the Secretary, not to those that might precede a private civil action"), aff'd, 720 F.2d 658 (1st Cir.1984); Hovey v. Lutheran Medical Center, 516 F.Supp. 554, 556-557 (E.D.N.Y.1981) ("Under section 626(d) an individual need not exhaust the possibilities of conciliation before commencing action; he merely must give the Secretary sixty days to reach a settlement.
discussed Cited "see" Concord Instruments Corp.
Tax Ct. · 1992 · signal: see · confidence high
See Nordberg v. Commissioner , 79 T.C. 655 , 664 (1982) , affd. without published opinion 720 F.2d 658 (1st Cir. 1983) ; Professional Insurance Agents v. Commissioner , 78 T.C. 246 , 269 (1982) , affd. 726 F.2d 1097 (6th Cir. 1984) ; Bradley v. Commissioner , 57 T.C. 1 , 7 (1971) .
discussed Cited "see" Hawkins v. Commissioner
Tax Ct. · 1990 · signal: see · confidence high
See Nordberg v. Commissioner , 79 T.C. 655 , 665 (1982) , affd. without published opinion 720 F.2d 658 (1st Cir. 1983) ; Hope v. Commissioner , 55 T.C. 1020 , 1030 (1971) , affd. 471 F.2d 738 (3d Cir. 1973) .
discussed Cited "see" Carl Kale v. Combined Insurance Company of America, Carl Kale v. Combined Insurance Company of America (2×) also: Cited "see, e.g."
1st Cir. · 1988 · signal: see · confidence high
See Leite v. Kennecott Copper Corp., 558 F.Supp. 1170, 1173-74 (D.Mass.), aff'd without opinion, 720 F.2d 658 (1st Cir.1983).
discussed Cited "see" Costello v. Commissioner
Tax Ct. · 1985 · signal: see · confidence high
See Nordberg v. Commissioner, 79 T.C. 655 , 665 (1982) , affd. without published opinion 720 F.2d 658 (1st Cir. 1983) ; Hope v. Commissioner, 55 T.C. 1020 , 1030 (1971) , affd. 471 F.2d 738 (3d Cir. 1973) .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Indianapolis Power & Light Co. v. Commissioner (2×)
Tax Ct. · 1987 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Nordberg v. Commissioner , 79 T.C. 655 , 663-68 (1982) , affd. without opinion, 720 F.2d 658 (1st Cir. 1983) ; Dubroff, "The Claim of Right Doctrine," 40 Tax L.
cited Cited "see, e.g." Illinois Power Company v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
7th Cir. · 1986 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Nordberg v. Commissioner, 79 T.C. 655, 663-68 (1982), aff'd without opinion, 720 F.2d 658 (1st Cir.1983); Dubroff, The Claim of Right Doctrine, 40 Tax L.Rev. 729 (1985).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Rocket Industries, Inc.
v.
Gauthier Tire & Recapping Co., Inc
82-1730.
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit.
Sep 29, 1983.
720 F.2d 658
Published
2 passages pin-cited by 2 cases
Pinpoint authority: #24,320 of 633,719
Citer courts: First Circuit (1) · D. Nevada (1)

720 F.2d 658

Rocket Industries, Inc.
v.
Gauthier Tire & Recapping Co., Inc.

82-1730, 82-1772

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS First Circuit

9/29/83

1

D.Mass.

AFFIRMED