green
Positive treatment
1.3 score
Treatment trajectory · 1983 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1983
2004
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
The Waldinger Corporation v. Crs Group Engineers, Inc., Clark Dietz Division, the Waldinger Corporation v. Ashbrook-Simon-Hartley, Inc., Crs Group Engineers, Inc., Clark Dietz Division
See, e.g., Bende & Sons, Inc. v. Crown Recreation, Inc., 548 F.Supp. 1018 (E.D.N.Y.1982), aff'd without opinion, 722 F.2d 727 (2d Cir.1983). 49 In the present case, refusal of the engineer to agree to waive all or part of the mechanical specifications in interpreting compliance with the project specifications, could have been foreseen as a distinct possibility that would affect performance. 50 Ashbrook contends it is excused from performance because it did not obtain the expected performance from the Engineer.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Waldinger Corp. v. CRS Group Engineers, Inc.
See, e.g., Bende & Sons, Inc. v. Crown Recreation, Inc., 548 F.Supp. 1018 (E.D.N.Y.1982), aff'd without opinion, 722 F.2d 727 (2d Cir.1983).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Dockery (Taylor)
v.
Henderson (Robert J.)
v.
Henderson (Robert J.)
82-2264.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.
Feb 17, 1983.
Published
Dockery (Taylor)
v.
Henderson (Robert J.)
NO. 82-2264
United States Court of Appeals,
second Circuit.
FEB 17, 1983
1
Appeal From: S.D.N.Y.
2
AFFIRMED.