green
Positive treatment
3.9 score
Treatment trajectory · 1983 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1983
2004
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 9 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Elton E. Bryan, A/K/A Butch
See United States v. Newman, 664 F.2d 12 (2d Cir.1981), aff'd after remand, 722 F.2d 729 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 863 , 104 S.Ct. 193 , 78 L.Ed.2d 170 (1983); United States v. Chestman, 947 F.2d 551 (2d Cir.1991) (en banc), cert. denied, 503 U.S. 1004 , 112 S.Ct. 1759 , 118 L.Ed.2d 422 (1992); SEC v. Cherif, 933 F.2d 403 (7th Cir.1991), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 1071 , 112 S.Ct. 966 , 117 L.Ed.2d 131 (1992); SEC v. Clark, 915 F.2d 439 (9th Cir.1990). 5 The Supreme Court has yet to address whether the misappropriation theory is reconcilable with the language and purposes of section 10(b) …
discussed
Cited "see"
Advanced Resources International, Incorporated v. Tri-Star Petroleum Company James H. Butler, (Two Cases)
(2×)
See United States v. Newman, 664 F.2d 12, 17 (2nd Cir.1981) (“a plaintiff need not be a defrauded purchaser or seller in order to sue for injunctive relief under Rule 10b-5”) aff'd, 722 F.2d 729 (2nd Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 863 , 104 S.Ct. 193 , 78 L.Ed.2d 170 (1983); Tully v. Mott Supermarkets, Inc., 540 F.2d 187, 194 (3rd Cir.1976) (assuming, “for present purposes,” that the Blue Chip standing rule does not apply where only in-junctive relief is sought to prevent incipient 10b-5 violations); Davis v. Davis, 526 F.2d 1286, 1289 (5th Cir.1976) (strict insistence on a purchase…
cited
Cited "see"
Chief Consolidated Mining Co. v. Sunshine Mining Co.
See United States v. Newman, 664 F.2d 12 (2d Cir.1981), aff'd mem. after remand, 722 F.2d 729 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 863 , 104 S.Ct. 193 , 78 L.Ed.2d 170 (1983).
cited
Cited "see"
Grant v. Barr (In re Parr Meadows Racing Ass'n)
See United States v. Thwaites Place Associates, 548 F.Supp. 94, 96 (S.D.N.Y.1982), aff 'd without opinion, 722 F.2d 729 (2d Cir.1983).
cited
Cited "see"
Thwaites Place Associates v. Secretary of the United States Department of Housing & Urban Development
See United States v. Thwaites Place Associates, 548 F.Supp. 94 (S.D.N.Y.1982), aff'd mem. 722 F.2d 729 (2d Cir.1983).
cited
Cited "see"
Chemical Bank v. Arthur Andersen & Co.
See United States v. Newman, 664 F.2d 12, 18-19 (2d Cir.1981), judgment following remand affirmed by order, 722 F.2d 729 (2 Cir.1983), cert, denied,-U.S.-, 104 S.Ct. 193 , 78 L.Ed.2d 170 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 99,643 Chemical Bank v. Arthur Andersen & Co., Manufacturers Hanover Trust Company and First Pennsylvania Bank, N.A. v. Arthur Andersen & Co., Security Pacific National Bank v. Arthur Andersen & Co.
See United States v. Newman, 664 F.2d 12, 18-19 (2d Cir.1981), judgment following remand affirmed by order, 722 F.2d 729 (2 Cir.1983), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 104 S.Ct. 193 , 78 L.Ed.2d 170 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Pereira v. Allboro Building Maintenance, Inc. (In Re Allboro Waterproofing Corp.)
See, e.g., United States v. Newman, 534 F.Supp. 1113, 1127 (S.D.N.Y.1982), aff'd, 722 F.2d 729 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 863 , 104 S.Ct. 193 78 L.Ed.2d 170 (1983) (deciding that two years of delay justified denial of a motion to disqualify made on the eve of trial); Jackson v. J.C.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Financial News Network, Inc.
See, e.g., United States v. Thwaites Place Associates, 548 F.Supp. 94, 96 (S.D.N.Y.1982), affd, 722 F.2d 729 (2d Cir.1983) (“the terms or conditions prescribed for a judicial sale are binding on any purchaser”).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Wilson (Harold)
v.
Hammock (Edward R.)
v.
Hammock (Edward R.)
82-2317.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.
Feb 15, 1983.
722 F.2d 729
Published
Wilson (Harold)
v.
Hammock (Edward R.)
NO. 82-2317
United States Court of Appeals,
second Circuit.
FEB 15, 1983
1
Appeal From: E.D.N.Y.
2
AFFIRMED.