green
Positive treatment
3.7 score
Treatment trajectory · 1984 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1984
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Commonwealth v. Delos Santos
United States v. Rackley, 724 F.2d 1463, 1469 (11th Cir. 1984).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
United States v. Greenough
“The test for determining whether the district judge erred in refusing to grant a motion for acquittal is whether, considering the evidence in the light most favorable to the Government, reasonable persons might find the evidence inconsistent with every reasonable hypothesis of innocence.” United States v. Rackley, 724 F.2d 1463, 1469 (11th Cir.1984), quoting United States v. Sanders, 639 F.2d 268, 270 (5th Cir.1981).
cited
Cited "see"
Francisco Avila-Murrieta v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
See 724 F.2d 1463 (11th Cir.1984).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Humberto Baron-Mantilla
See United States v. Rackley, 724 F.2d 1463, 1468 (11th Cir.1984).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Robinson Antonio MARTI-XIQUES, Petitioner,
v.
IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent
v.
IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent
82-6141.
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit.
Jan 27, 1984.
Stephen H. Broudy, Miami, Fla., for petitioner., Lauri Steven Filppu, U.S. Dept, of Justice, James A. Hunolt, Dept. I.N.S., Washington, D.C., Elena R. Stinson, San Juan, P.R., for respondent.
Godbold, Fay, Clark.
Cited by 4 opinions | Published
ON PETITION FOR REHEARING
(Opinion September 9, 1988, 11th Cir., 1983, 713 F.2d 1511)
Before GODBOLD, Chief Judge, FAY and CLARK, Circuit Judges. BY THE COURT:The petition of Immigration and Naturalization Service for rehearing is GRANTED. The opinion at 713 F.2d 1511 (11th Cir.1983) is VACATED and the case is assigned to the oral argument calendar and classified as a Class III case.