Frank Haygood v. Evelle J. Younger, Etc., & Harold Cranke & Benjamin Seymour, L.R. Bretz v. Zollie Kelman, Jack R. Lande, Eugene R. Welborn, Donald Zeman, James Cook & the City of Great Falls, Montana, a Mun. Corp., James Piatt v. Ellis MacDougall, 729 F.2d 613 (9th Cir. 1984). · Go Syfert
Search
Frank Haygood v. Evelle J. Younger, Etc., & Harold Cranke & Benjamin Seymour, L.R. Bretz v. Zollie Kelman, Jack R. Lande, Eugene R. Welborn, Donald Zeman, James Cook & the City of Great Falls, Montana, a Mun. Corp., James Piatt v. Ellis MacDougall, 729 F.2d 613 (9th Cir. 1984). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
30 citation events across 9 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: York v. City of San Pablo (cand, 1985-06-11)
Treatment trajectory · 1984 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1984 2005 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" York v. City of San Pablo
N.D. Cal. · 1985 · signal: see · confidence high
See Haygood v. Younger, 729 F.2d 613 (9th Cir.1984).
discussed Cited "see" Gerald Albers v. Harold Whitley (2×)
9th Cir. · 1984 · signal: see · confidence high
See Haygood v. Younger, 718 F.2d 1472, 1482-83 (9th Cir.1983), petition for rehearing en banc granted, 729 F.2d 613 (9th Cir.1984); Miller v. Solem, 728 F.2d 1020, 1024 (8th Cir.1984).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Frank Haygood
v.
Evelle J. Younger, Etc., and Harold Cranke and Benjamin Seymour, L.R. Bretz v. Zollie Kelman, Jack R. Lande, Eugene R. Welborn, Donald Zeman, James Cook and the City of Great Falls, Montana, a Municipal Corporation, James Piatt v. Ellis MacDougall
82-3111.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
Mar 28, 1984.
729 F.2d 613
Cited by 6 opinions  |  Published

729 F.2d 613

Frank HAYGOOD, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Evelle J. YOUNGER, etc., Defendants, and Harold Cranke and
Benjamin Seymour, Defendants-Appellants.
L.R. BRETZ, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Zollie KELMAN, Jack R. Lande, Eugene R. Welborn, Donald
Zeman, James Cook and the City of Great Falls,
Montana, a municipal corporation,
Defendants-Appellees.
James PIATT, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Ellis MacDOUGALL, Defendant-Appellee.

Nos. 81-4686, 82-3111 and 82-5328.

United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.

March 28, 1984.

William George Prahl, Deputy Atty. Gen., Sacramento, Cal., for defendants-appellants in No. 81-4686.

Jack Jacobson, Santa Cruz, Cal., for plaintiff-appellee in No. 81-4686.

L.R. Bretz, Billings, Mont., for plaintiff-appellant in No. 82-3111.

William Conklin, Gregory H. Warner, Graybill, Ostrem, Warner & Crotty, Great Falls, Mont., for defendants-appellees in No. 82-3111.

James Piatt, in pro. per.

Jay R. Adkins, Asst. Atty. Gen., Phoenix, Ariz., for defendant-appellee in No. 82-5328.

Before BROWNING, Chief Judge, CHOY, GOODWIN, WALLACE, SNEED, KENNEDY, ANDERSON, HUG, TANG, SKOPIL, SCHROEDER, FLETCHER, FARRIS, PREGERSON, ALARCON, POOLE, FERGUSON, NELSON, CANBY, BOOCHEVER, NORRIS and REINHARDT, Circuit Judges.

1

Upon the vote of a majority of the regular active judges of this court, these cases are consolidated for rehearing by the en banc court pursuant to Rule 25 of the Rules of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The previous three-judge panel assignments are withdrawn.