green
Positive treatment
3.4 score
Treatment trajectory · 1983 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1983
2004
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 12 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Jama v. United States Immigration & Naturalization Service
See Angleton v. Pierce, 574 F.Supp. 719, 735 (D.N.J.1983) (noting that both federal and New Jersey common law apply the same “general principle ... that a third party acquires enforceable contract rights if the parties to the contract intended to confer a benefit upon him, but not if he benefits only incidentally from the contract”), aff'd 734 F.2d 3 (3rd Cir.1984).
cited
Cited "see"
Snyder v. Baumecker
See Angleton v. Pierce, 574 F.Supp. 719 , 723 n. 1 (D.N.J.1983), aff’d mem., 734 F.2d 3 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 880 , 105 S.Ct. 245 , 83 L.Ed.2d 183 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
North Star Hotels Corp. v. Mid-City Hotel Associates
See U.S. Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. DiMassa, *1270 561 F.Supp. 348, 351 (E.D.Pa.1983), aff'd, 734 F.2d 3 (3d Cir.1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Educational Testing Services v. Katzman
See Association of American Medical Colleges v. Mikaelian, 571 F.Supp. 144, 150 (E.D.Pa. 1983) (medical school admission test), aff'd, 734 F.2d 3 (3d Cir.1984); National Conference of Bar Examiners v. Multistate Legal Studies, Inc., 495 F.Supp. 34, 36 (N.D.
discussed
Cited "see"
Educational Testing Service v. John Katzman
See Association of American Medical Colleges v. Mikaelian, 571 F.Supp. 144, 150 (E.D.Pa.1983) (medical school admission test), aff'd, 734 F.2d 3 (3d Cir.1984); National Conference of Bar Examiners v. Multistate Legal Studies, Inc., 495 F.Supp. 34, 36 (N.D.Ill.1980) (bar examination), aff'd in part, rev'd in part, 692 F.2d 478 (7th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 814 , 104 S.Ct. 69 , 78 L.Ed.2d 83 (1983). 32 Defendants argue that the principle of merger between the idea and expression is applicable in this case because the idea or subject of the material at issue can be expressed only in a li…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Debbie F. Simon v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Applicable law 17 In determining whether to remand a case “in light of new 18 evidence,” “the court examines both whether the new evidence is 19 material to a disability determination and whether a claimant has 20 shown good cause for having failed to present the new evidence to 21 the ALJ earlier.” Mayes v. Massanari, 276 F.3d 453, 462 (9th 22 Cir. 2001) (as amended). 23 To be “material,” the new evidence “must bear ‘directly and 24 substantially on the matter in dispute.’” Id. (quoting Ward v. 25 Schweiker, 686 F.2d 762, 764 (9th Cir. 1982)); see also Skuja v. 26 Colvin, …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Estate of Avrom A. Silver, Bonny Fern Silver, Kenneth Kirsh, and Ronald Faust, Executors v. Commissioner
See, e.g., Estate of Burghardt v. Commissioner, * * * [ 80 T.C. 705, 717 (1983), affd. without published opinion 734 F.2d 3 (3d Cir. 1984)] (treating a reference to a “specific exemption” in a U.S.-Italy estate tax treaty as not limited to an exemption as such, but included a subsequently enacted unified credit having the same function as an exemption); Smith, “Tax Treaty Interpretation by the Judiciary”, 49 Tax Law. 845 , 858-867 (1996).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
American Air Liquide, Inc. v. Commissioner
When a treaty and a statute relate to the same subject, courts attempt to construe them so as to give effect to both, see Whitney v. Robertson, 124 U.S. 190, 194 (1888), because “the intention to abrogate or modify a treaty is not to be lightly imputed to the Congress”, Menominee Tribe v. United States, 391 U.S. 404, 413 (1968) (quoting Pigeon River Co. v. Cox Co., 291 U.S. 138, 160 (1934)); see also Estate of Burghardt v. Commissioner, 80 T.C. 705, 713 (1983), affd. without published opinion 734 F.2d 3 (3d Cir. 1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
American Air Liquide, Inc. and Subsidiaries v. Commissioner
When a treaty and a statute relate to the same subject, courts attempt to construe them so as to give effect to both, see Whitney v. Robertson, 124 U.S. 190, 194 (1888), because “the intention to abrogate or modify a treaty is not to be lightly imputed to the Congress”, Menominee Tribe v. United States, 391 U.S. 404, 413 (1968) (quoting Pigeon River Co. v. Cox Co., 291 U.S. 138, 160 (1934)); see also Estate of Burghardt v. Commissioner, 80 T.C. 705, 713 (1983), affd. without published opinion 734 F.2d 3 (3d Cir. 1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Cabrillo
See also Cusanno v. *447 Fidelity Bank, 29 B.R. 810, 812 (E.D.Pa.1983), vacated as moot, 734 F.2d 3 (3d Cir.1984) (automatic stay applies to an “administrative hold” on the debtors’ cheeking account).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
NAACP, Boston Chapter v. Pierce
State Highway Commission of Missouri v. Volpe, 479 F.2d 1099, 1105 (8th Cir.1973) (quoting Sikora v. Brenner, 379 F.2d 134, 136 (D.C.Cir.1967)); see also Angleton v. Pierce, 574 F.Supp. 719, 728 (D.N.J.1983) aff'd w/o op., 734 F.2d 3 (3rd Cir.1984), cert. denied — U.S.-, 105 S.Ct. 245 , 83 L.Ed.2d 183 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Comm'r
(2×)
See, e.g., Estate of Burghardt v. Commissioner, * * * [ 80 T.C. 705 , 717 (1983) , affd. without published opinion 734 F.2d 3 (3d Cir. 1984)] (treating a reference to a "specific exemption" in a U.S.-Italy estate tax treaty as not limited to an exemption as such, but included a subsequently enacted unified credit having the same function as an exemption); Smith, "Tax Treaty Interpretation by the Judiciary", 49 Tax Law. 845 , 858-867 (1996) .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Bankers and Shippers Ins. Co. Of New York
v.
James H. Hartman and Son, Inc
v.
James H. Hartman and Son, Inc
83-1691.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit.
Apr 16, 1984.
734 F.2d 3
Published
Bankers and Shippers Ins. Co. of New York
v.
James H. Hartman and Son, Inc.
83-1691
United States Court of Appeals,
Third Circuit.
4/16/84
E.D.Pa.,
Weiner, J.,
AFFIRMED