37 Fair empl.prac.cas. 1303, 35 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 34,695 Nemesio D. Domingo, Jr. Samuel Cabansag, Jr. Joseph C. Ancheta Thomas G. Carpenter & Terri Jane Mast, as Adm'r of the Est. of Silme G. Domingo Nellie Kookesh Audrey A. Merculief Frank Paul Mary Paul Tony Evon, Sr. & Samuel Strauss, Plaintiffs-Appellants/cross-Appellees v. New England Fish Co., & Nefco Fidalgo Packing Co., Defendants-Appellees/cross-Appellants, 742 F.2d 520 (9th Cir. 1984). · Go Syfert
Search
37 Fair empl.prac.cas. 1303, 35 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 34,695 Nemesio D. Domingo, Jr. Samuel Cabansag, Jr. Joseph C. Ancheta Thomas G. Carpenter & Terri Jane Mast, as Adm'r of the Est. of Silme G. Domingo Nellie Kookesh Audrey A. Merculief Frank Paul Mary Paul Tony Evon, Sr. & Samuel Strauss, Plaintiffs-Appellants/cross-Appellees v. New England Fish Co., & Nefco Fidalgo Packing Co., Defendants-Appellees/cross-Appellants, 742 F.2d 520 (9th Cir. 1984). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
54 citation events (13 in the last 25 years) across 16 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Hannon v. Chater (cand, 1995-05-26)
Treatment trajectory · 1984 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1984 2005 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Hannon v. Chater
N.D. Cal. · 1995 · signal: see · confidence high
See, Domingo v. New England Fish Co., 727 F.2d 1429 , 1436 & n. 3 (9th Cir.) (word-of-mouth recruiting by white superintendents who gave preference to friends and relatives “predictably” resulted in circumstances where “nearly all those hired were white”), modified on other grounds, 742 F.2d 520 (1984).
cited Cited "see" 47 Fair empl.prac.cas. 163, 44 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 37,367 Frank Atonio, Eugene Baclig, Randy Del Fierro, Clarke Kido, Lester Kuramoto, Alan Lew, Curtis Lew, Robert Morris, Joaquin Arruiza, Barbara Viernes, as Administratrix of the Estate of Gene Allen Viernes, and All Others Similarly Situated v. Wards Cove Packing Company, Inc., Castle & Cooke, Inc., and Columbia Wards Fisheries
9th Cir. · 1987 · signal: see · confidence high
See Domingo, 445 F.Supp. 421, 435 (W.D.Wash.1977), aff'd, 727 F.2d 1429 (9th Cir.), modified, 742 F.2d 520 (9th Cir.1984).
cited Cited "see" Julie Chalmers v. City of Los Angeles, a Municipal Corporation
9th Cir. · 1986 · signal: see · confidence high
See Domingo v. New England Fish Co., 727 F.2d 1429, 1447 (9th Cir.), modified, 742 F.2d 520 (9th Cir.1984).
discussed Cited "see" Beaudry Motor Company v. Abko Properties
9th Cir. · 1986 · signal: see · confidence high
We cannot affirm the district court's order because "[t]he gap between the figures employed by [the party requesting fees] * * * and the amount ordered by the district court is too great to permit a mere recital of having considered Kerr to insulate the order from reversal." Harmon v. San Diego County, 664 F.2d 770, 772 (9th Cir.1982) (as amended); see Domingo v. New England Fish Co., 727 F.2d 1429, 1447 (9th Cir.), modified, 742 F.2d 520 (9th Cir.1984).
discussed Cited "see" Beaudry Motor Co. v. Abko Properties, Inc.
9th Cir. · 1986 · signal: see · confidence high
We cannot affirm the district court’s order because “[t]he gap between the figures employed by [the party requesting fees] * * * and the amount ordered by the district court is too great to permit a mere recital of having considered Kerr to insulate the order from reversal.” Harmon v. San Diego County, 664 F.2d 770, 772 (9th Cir.1982) (as amended); see Domingo v. New England Fish Co., 727 F.2d 1429, 1447 (9th Cir.), modified, 742 F.2d 520 (9th Cir.1984).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Nelson v. Sorrento Tower Apartments
S.D. Cal. · 2022 · signal: see also · confidence low
(Doc. 28–1 at 7–8); see Clark v. Safeway, Inc., 478 F. Supp. 3d 1080 , 1088 (D. 20 Or. 2020 ) (explaining that “Plaintiff must establish intentional discrimination; disparate 21 impact is insufficient to establish a claim under section 1981”); see also Domingo v. New 22 England Fish Co., 727 F.2d 1429, 1438 (9th Cir.), modified, 742 F.2d 520 (9th Cir. 1984) 23 (“proof of intent to discriminate is necessary to establish a violation of 42 U.S.C. § 1981”). 24 Thus, the Court concludes Plaintiff fails to state a claim as to this cause of action. 25 iii.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Bobbie Jean Green v. Los Angeles County Superintendent of Schools Los Angeles County Office of Education Los Angeles County Board of Education
9th Cir. · 1989 · signal: see also · confidence low
Williams v. Owens-Illinois, Inc., 665 F.2d 918, 924 (9th Cir.) (citation omitted), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 971 , 103 S.Ct. 302 , 74 L.Ed.2d 283 (1982); see also Domingo v. New England Fish Co., 727 F.2d 1429, 1443 (9th Cir.1984), modified, 742 F.2d 520 (1984); Reed v. Lockheed Aircraft Co., 613 F.2d 757, 760 (9th Cir.1980).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
37 Fair empl.prac.cas. 1303, 35 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 34,695 Nemesio D. Domingo, Jr. Samuel Cabansag, Jr. Joseph C. Ancheta Thomas G. Carpenter and Terri Jane Mast, as Administrator of the Estate of Silme G. Domingo Nellie Kookesh Audrey A. Merculief Frank Paul Mary Paul Tony Evon, Sr. And Samuel Strauss, Plaintiffs-Appellants/cross-Appellees
v.
New England Fish Company, and Nefco Fidalgo Packing Co., Defendants-Appellees/cross-Appellants
82-3027.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
Sep 7, 1984.
742 F.2d 520
Published

742 F.2d 520

37 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. 1303,
35 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 34,695
Nemesio D. DOMINGO, Jr.; Samuel Cabansag, Jr.; Joseph C.
Ancheta; Thomas G. Carpenter and Terri Jane Mast, as
administrator of the estate of Silme G. Domingo; Nellie
Kookesh; Audrey A. Merculief; Frank Paul; Mary Paul;
Tony Evon, Sr.; and Samuel Strauss,
Plaintiffs-Appellants/Cross-Appellees,
v.
NEW ENGLAND FISH COMPANY, and Nefco Fidalgo Packing Co.,
Defendants-Appellees/Cross-Appellants.

Nos. 81-3702, 82-3026, 82-3027 and 82-3035.

United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.

Sept. 7, 1984.

1

Abraham A. Arditi, Northwest Labor & Employment Law Office, Seattle, Wash., Craig Tillery, Alaska Legal Service Corp., Anchorage, Alaska, for plaintiffs-appellants/cross-appellees.

2

Michael Dundy, Bogle & Gates, Anchorage, Alaska, for defendants-appellees/cross-appellants.

3

Before CHOY and FLETCHER, Circuit Judges, and MacBRIDE,[*] District judge.

ORDER FOR PUBLICATION

4

It is ordered that the opinion filed March 13, 1984, 727 F.2d 1429, be modified as follows:

5

The two sentences beginning at page 12, line 26 [at page 1438, column 1 line 31], with "Title", and ending at page 13, line 5 [at page 1438, column 1 line 38], with "damages," are replaced by: "Title VII allows monetary relief only in the form of backpay or other equitable relief. See 42 U.S.C. Sec. 2000e-5(g): Padway v. Palches, 665 F.2d 965, 968 (9th Cir.1982). Because plaintiffs have not shown that any minority group received an inferior quality food as compared to that received by other groups, we have no basis for a monetary award."

6

The sentence at page 31, lines 14-15 [at page 1447, column 2 lines 1-2], "The parties shall bear their respective costs in this appeal," is replaced with: "Plaintiffs are entitled to their costs and reasonable attorney's fees in this appeal. Upon presentation of appropriate documentation, this court will determine the sums to be awarded as costs and attorney's fees."

7

Plaintiffs shall have thirty (30) days from the date of filing of this order to make application for attorneys' fees and costs.

*

The Honorable Thomas J. MacBride, Senior United States District Judge for the Eastern District of California, sitting by designation