United States v. Canales (Aurora), 750 F.2d 69 (5th Cir. 1984). · Go Syfert
Search
United States v. Canales (Aurora), 750 F.2d 69 (5th Cir. 1984). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
33 citation events (1 in the last 25 years) across 13 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Dickerson v. State (texapp, 1987-11-05)
Treatment trajectory · 1984 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1984 2005 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Dickerson v. State
Tex. App. · 1987 · signal: see · confidence high
See Milton v. Procunier, 744 F.2d 1091, 1096 (5th Cir.1984), reh’g denied, 750 F.2d 69 , cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1030 , 105 S.Ct. 2050 , 85 L.Ed.2d 323 (1985), reh’g denied, 471 U.S. 1132 , 105 S.Ct. 2667 , 86 L.Ed.2d 283 .
discussed Cited "see" In Re Gas Reclamation, Inc. Securities Litigation
S.D.N.Y. · 1987 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Blankenship, 746 F.2d 233 (5th Cir.1984), rehearing denied (en banc), 750 F.2d 69 (5th Cir.1984) (mail fraud); United States v. Hewes, 729 F.2d 1302 (11th Cir.1984), rehearing denied (en banc), 734 F.2d 1481 (11th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1110 , 105 S.Ct. 790 , 83 L.Ed.2d 783 (1985) (wire fraud).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Minor v. Henderson
S.D.N.Y. · 1991 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., United States v. Canales, 744 F.2d 413, 431 (5th Cir.1984), reh’g denied, 750 F.2d 69 (5th Cir.1984) (en banc) (“When we are asked to reverse in these circumstances we are, in effect, asked to go against the implicit judgment of both the trial court and the defendant’s trial counsel that the trial court’s corrective action was adequate and appropriate”); Shaw v. Stone, 506 F.Supp. 571, 576 (M.D.Ga.1981), aff 'd sub nom.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Billy L. Massey and Larry P. Wages
5th Cir. · 1987 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also United States v. Blankenship, 746 F.2d 233 (5th Cir.), reh’g denied, 750 F.2d 69 (5th Cir.1984); United States v. Finney, 714 F.2d 420 (5th Cir.1983); United States v. Toney, 598 F.2d 1349, 1355 (5th Cir.1979), ce rt. denied, 444 U.S. 1033 , 100 S.Ct. 706 , 62 L.Ed.2d 670 (1980).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Tichnell
Md. · 1986 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Milton v. Procunier, 744 F.2d 1091 , reh’g en banc denied, 750 F.2d 69 (5th Cir.1984), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 105 S.Ct. 2050 , 85 L.Ed.2d 323 (1985); Tyler v. Kemp, 755 F.2d 741 , reh’g en banc denied, 765 F.2d 154 (11th Cir.), cert. denied sub nom.
cited Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Richard E. Schuster, M.D.
5th Cir. · 1985 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also United States v. Canales, 744 F.2d 413 (5th Cir.), reh’g denied, 750 F.2d 69 (1984).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
United States
v.
Canales (Aurora)
83-2517.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.
Nov 16, 1984.
750 F.2d 69
Published

750 F.2d 69

U.S.
v.
Canales (Aurora)

NO. 83-2517

United States Court of Appeals,
fifth Circuit.

NOV 16, 1984

Appeal From: S.D.Tex., 744 F.2d 413

1

Denials of Rehearing En Banc.