Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc. v. The United States, 753 F.2d 1061 (Fed. Cir. 1985). · Go Syfert
Search
Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc. v. The United States, 753 F.2d 1061 (Fed. Cir. 1985). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
37 citation events (3 in the last 25 years) across 4 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: James F. Rogers v. Department of Education (cafc, 1987-11-09)
Treatment trajectory · 1985 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1985 2005 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited as authority (rule) James F. Rogers v. Department of Education
Fed. Cir. · 1987 · confidence medium
Ginnodo v. Office of Personnel Management, 753 F.2d 1061, 1064 (Fed.Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 848 (1985); Grier, 750 F.2d at 946 .
cited Cited as authority (rule) John G. Hagmeyer v. Department of the Treasury
Fed. Cir. · 1985 · confidence medium
Ginnodo v. Office of Personnel Management, 753 F.2d 1061, 1064 (Fed.Cir.1985).
discussed Cited "see" William B. Schmidt v. Department of Interior
Fed. Cir. · 1998 · signal: see · confidence high
See Ginnodo v. Office of Personnel Management, 753 F.2d 1061, 1063 (Fed.Cir.1985) (affirming agency’s elimination of a competitive area consisting of only a single individual); Grier v. Department of Health & Human Servs., 750 F.2d 944, 946 (Fed.Cir.1984) (affirming agency’s elimination of all positions in a competitive area).
discussed Cited "see" Richard J. O'Brien v. Office of Personnel Management (2×)
Fed. Cir. · 1998 · signal: see · confidence high
See Ginnodo v. Office of Personnel Management, 753 F.2d 1061 (Fed.Cir.1985) (upholding removal of employee in a one-person competitive area over objection that he should have been allowed to compete for retention with employees in other competitive areas).
cited Cited "see" Markland v. Office of Personnel Management
Fed. Cir. · 1998 · signal: see · confidence high
See Ginnodo v. Office of Personnel Management, 753 F.2d 1061, 1063-64 (Fed.Cir.1985) (upholding a competitive area of one).
cited Cited "see" NEC America, Inc. v. United States
Ct. Intl. Trade · 1987 · signal: see · confidence high
See Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc. v. United States, 7 CIT 178 , 183-84, 585 F. Supp. 649, 654 (1984), aff’d, 753 F.2d 1061 (Fed.
cited Cited "see" Terumo Corp. v. United States
Ct. Intl. Trade · 1986 · signal: see · confidence high
See Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc. v. United States, 7 CIT 178 , 585 F. Supp. 649, 655 (1984), aff’d, 753 F.2d 1061 (Fed.
cited Cited "see, e.g." Richard A. Deweese v. Tennessee Valley Authority
Fed. Cir. · 1994 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
Agencies are given authority to define competitive levels and areas for purposes of RIF. 5 C.F.R. §§ 351.402 , .403; see, e.g., Ginnodo v. OPM, 753 F.2d 1061 (Fed.Cir.1985).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc.
v.
The United States
84-1326.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.
Feb 1, 1985.
753 F.2d 1061
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published

753 F.2d 1061

6 ITRD 1750, 3 Fed. Cir. (T) 93

TOYOTA MOTOR SALES, U.S.A., INC., Appellant,
v.
The UNITED STATES, Appellee.

Appeal No. 84-1326.

United States Court of Appeals,
Federal Circuit.

Feb. 1, 1985.

William Brashares, Cladouhos & Brashares, Washington, D.C., argued for appellant. With him on the brief were Harry W. Cladouhos, Paul M. Laurenza and Mari-Anne Pisarri, Washington, D.C., of counsel.

Joseph S. Kaplan & John B. Pellegrini, Baskin & Steingut, P.C., of New York City, of counsel.

William A. Plourde, Jr. and David D. Laufer, Torrence, Cal., of counsel.

Saul Davis, Dept. of Justice, of New York City, argued for appellee. With him on the brief were Richard K. Willard, Acting Asst. Atty. Gen., Washington, D.C., David M. Cohen, Director, Joseph I. Liebman, Atty. in Charge International Trade Field Office, and Michael P. Maxwell, New York City.

Before BALDWIN, KASHIWA and NIES, Circuit Judges.

NIES, Circuit Judge.

[*~1061]1

This is an appeal from a judgment of the United States Court of International Trade sustaining the classification of certain cab chassis, imported from Japan from January 1980 to July 1981, under item 692.02 of the Tariff Schedules of the United States (TSUS).

[*~1065]2

The issues on appeal were thoroughly treated in the trial court's opinion reported at 7 CIT ----, 585 F.Supp. 649 (1984). Contrary to appellant's argument, Daisy-Heddon, Div. Victor Comptometer Corp. v. United States, 600 F.2d 799, 66 CCPA 97 (1979) is the most pertinent precedent and leads us also to conclude that the articles in question fall within the scope of item 692.02 (TSUS) as unfinished automobile trucks and not within either item 692.20 (TSUS) as automobile truck chassis or item 692.10 (TSUS) as other automobile trucks. Accordingly, we affirm on the basis of Senior Judge Maletz's opinion.

[*~1066]3

AFFIRMED.