green
Positive treatment
4.7 score
Treatment trajectory · 1985 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1985
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Makina ve Kimya Endustrisi Kurumu v. Kaya
See Ohntrup v. Firearms Ctr., Inc., 802 F.2d 676, 677 (3d Cir. 1986) citing Appeal of Makina ve Kimya Endustrisi Kurumu, 760 F.2d 259 (3rd Cir.1985), affirming mem., Ohntrup v. Firearms Center, 516 F.Supp. 1281 (E.D.
cited
Cited "see"
In re: Beverly Ohntrup v.
See Appeal of Makina Ve Kimya Endus-trisi Kurumu, 760 F.2d 259 (3d Cir.1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
Beverly Ohntrup v. Makina Ve Kimya Endustrisi Kur
See Appeal of Makina Ve Kimya Endustrisi Kurumu (Ohntrup I), 760 F.2d 259 (3d Cir.1985). *293 The law firm of Morgan Lewis & Bocki-us (the Firm or Morgan Lewis) represented MKEK throughout the products liability litigation.
discussed
Cited "see"
Laura Ann Vermeulen v. Renault, U.S.A., Inc., Regie Nationale Des Usines Renault
(2×)
See Ohntrup v. Firearms Center, Inc., 516 F.Supp. 1281, 1285 (E.D.Pa.1981) ("Personal injury suits are within the scope of this exception."), aff'd, 760 F.2d 259 (3d Cir.1985); see also Martin v. Republic of South Africa, 836 F.2d 91, 93 (2d Cir.1987) (applying section 1605(a)(2) in ordinary personal injury case); Zernicek v. Brown & Root, Inc., 826 F.2d 415, 418 (5th Cir.1987) (same), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1043 , 108 S.Ct. 775 , 98 L.Ed.2d 862 (1988); Australian Gov’t Aircraft Factories v. Lynne, 743 F.2d 672 , 674 (9th Cir.1984) (same), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1214 , 105 S.Ct. 1189 , 84 L.…
discussed
Cited "see"
Perino v. Cohen (In Re Cohen)
See O’Hara v. Board of Education of Vocational Schools, 590 F.Supp. 696 (D.N.J.1984), aff'd, 760 F.2d 259 (3d Cir.1985) (where a plaintiff never adequately explained her absence, she could not assert that she was not afforded an adequate opportunity to litigate).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Philippine Export & Foreign Loan Guarantee Corp. v. Chuidian
Petroleos Mexicanos v. Crawford Enterprises, Inc (5th Cir.1987) 826 F.2d 392 ; Canadian Overseas Ores Ltd. v. Compania, etc. (S.D.N.Y. 1982) 528 F. Supp. 1337 , affd. (2d Cir.1984) 727 F.2d 274 ; Letelier v. Republic of Chile, supra, 748 F.2d at p. 798 ; see also United States of Mexico v. Rask (1931) 118 Cal. App. 21, 33 [ 4 P.2d 981 ].) Although immunity from personal jurisdiction may be waived by not objecting at the first available opportunity ( Barragan v. Banco BCH, supra, 188 Cal. App.3d at p. 293 ), sovereign immunity from execution, unlike immunity from personal jurisdiction, is in th…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Maritime Ventures International, Inc. v. Caribbean Trading & Fidelity, Ltd.
See, e.g., Ohntrup v. Firearms Center Inc., 516 F.Supp. 1281, 1284-85 (E.D.Pa.1981), aff'd, 760 F.2d 259 (3d Cir.1985); Verlinden, 488 F.Supp. at 1301-02 .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Falcoal, Inc. v. Turkiye Komur Isletmeleri Kurumu
See, e.g., Ohntrup v. Firearms Center, Inc., 516 F.Supp. 1281, 1284-85 (E.D.Pa.1981), aff 'd, 760 F.2d 259 & 263 (3d Cir.1985).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Muhammad
v.
Semicole Allied Van Lines
v.
Semicole Allied Van Lines
84-5517.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit.
Mar 4, 1985.
760 F.2d 259
Published
Muhammad
v.
Semicole Allied Van Lines
84-5517
United States Court of Appeals,
Third Circuit.
3/4/85
D.N.J.,
Debevoise, J.
AFFIRMED