green
Positive treatment
3.1 score
Treatment trajectory · 1985 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1985
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
TIllman-Branch v. The Grand Rehab and Nursing at Barnwell
See Dewitt v. Lieberman, 48 F. Supp. 2d 280, 288 (S.D.N.Y. 1999) (quoting Amarnare v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc., 611 F. Supp. 344, 349 (S.D.N.Y. 1984), aff'd, 770 F.2d 157 (2d Cir. 1985)) (other citations omitted).
discussed
Cited "see"
Zinn v. McKune
(2×)
See Amarnare v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., 611 F.Supp. 344, 349 (S.D.N.Y.1984), aff'd 770 F.2d 157 (2d Cir.1985). 33 There is evidence in the record that PHS and KDOC split the right to control Zinn's work.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. 349 South 4th Avenue, Mount Vernon, New York 10550
See El Cid, Ltd. v. New Jersey Zinc Co., 575 F.Supp. 1513, 1517 (S.D.N.Y.1983) (“It is well settled that where rights to real property are in issue, the law of the situs of the property control^].”), aff' d, 770 F.2d 157 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1021 , 106 S.Ct. 573 , 88 L.Ed.2d 557 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Bampoe v. Coach Stores, Inc.
See, e.g., Amarnare v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc., 611 F.Supp. 344, 349 (S.D.N.Y.1984), aff'd, 770 F.2d 157 (2d Cir.1985) (“a [temporary worker] whose salary is paid by one entity while his services are engaged on a temporary basis by another is an employee of both entities”).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Mullis v. Mechanics & Farmers Bank
See, e.g., Amamare v. Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith, Inc., 611 F.Supp. 344 (S.D.N.Y.1984), aff'd, 770 F.2d 157 (2d Cir. 1985) (holding that temporary employee was employee of both temporary agency and special employer for purposes of Title VII); Maynard, 626 F.2d 359 (same for purposes of state worker’s compensation law); Beaver v. Jacuzzi Bros., Inc., 454 F.2d 284 (8th Cir.1972) (same for purposes of state worker’s compensation law).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Graves v. Lowery
See also Amarnare v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc., 611 F.Supp. 344, 348 (S.D.N.Y.1984) (“When an employer has the right to control the means and manner of an individual’s performance ... an employer-employee relationship is likely to exist.”), aff'd, 770 F.2d 157 (2d Cir.1985).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Andersen v. Roszkowski
See, e.g., In re Martin-Trigona, 573 F.Supp. 1237, 1242-43 (D.Conn.1983), appeal dismissed, 770 F.2d 157 (2d Cir.1985) (“[I]t is clear that a judge is not disqualified ... merely because a litigant sues or threatens to sue him.”); United States v. Grismore, 564 F.2d 929, 933 (10th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 954 , 98 S.Ct. 1586 , 55 L.Ed.2d 806 (1978) (“A judge is not disqualified because a litigant sues or threatens to sue him.”).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Kaschak
v.
Ibm Corp
v.
Ibm Corp
84-7713.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.
Jun 5, 1985.
Published
Kaschak
v.
IBM Corp.
84-7713
United States Court of Appeals,
Second Circuit.
6/5/85
1
N.D.N.Y.
AFFIRMED