Sarah Coursen & Katherine Cook v. A.H. Robins Co., Inc., a Virginia Corp., Pamela Van Duyn, Terri Johnson, Joanna B. Kuhnhenn, Gayle McCann Laurie Jo Franz, & Debbie Rohl v. A.H. Robins Co., Inc., a Virginia Corp., 773 F.2d 1049 (9th Cir. 1985). · Go Syfert
Search
Sarah Coursen & Katherine Cook v. A.H. Robins Co., Inc., a Virginia Corp., Pamela Van Duyn, Terri Johnson, Joanna B. Kuhnhenn, Gayle McCann Laurie Jo Franz, & Debbie Rohl v. A.H. Robins Co., Inc., a Virginia Corp., 773 F.2d 1049 (9th Cir. 1985). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
73 citation events (18 in the last 25 years) across 9 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Unioil, Inc. v. Hutton & Co., Inc. (ca9, 1987-02-26)
Treatment trajectory · 1985 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1985 2005 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Unioil, Inc. v. Hutton & Co., Inc.
9th Cir. · 1987 · confidence medium
Robins Co., 764 F.2d 1329 (9th Cir.) (Coursen), corrected, 773 F.2d 1049 (9th Cir.1985), where we held that a dismissal with prejudice was appealable, whether voluntary or involuntary. 764 F.2d at 1342-43 , corrected, 773 F.2d at 1049.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Sarah Coursen and Katherine Cook
v.
A.H. Robins Company, Inc., a Virginia Corporation, Pamela Van Duyn, Terri Johnson, Joanna B. Kuhnhenn, Gayle McCann Laurie Jo Franz, and Debbie Rohl v. A.H. Robins Company, Inc., a Virginia Corporation
84-3853.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
Oct 8, 1985.
773 F.2d 1049
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published

773 F.2d 1049

Sarah COURSEN and Katherine Cook, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
A.H. ROBINS COMPANY, INC., a Virginia corporation,
Defendant-Appellee.
Pamela VAN DUYN, Terri Johnson, Joanna B. Kuhnhenn, Gayle
McCann, Laurie Jo Franz, and Debbie Rohl,
Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
A.H. ROBINS COMPANY, INC., a Virginia corporation, Defendant-Appellee.

Nos. 84-3853 to 84-3861.

United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.

Oct. 8, 1985.

ORDER

1

Before GOODWIN and SKOPIL, Circuit Judges, and VUKASIN,[*] District Judge.

2

The original opinion in this matter, which appears at 764 F.2d 1329 (9th Cir.1985), contains a typographical error on page 1342. The sentence immediately following headnote 23 on page 1342 should be changed to read as follows: "While a plaintiff cannot appeal a voluntary dismissal without prejudice, he or she may appeal a dismissal with prejudice."

*

The Honorable John P. Vukasin, Jr., United States District Judge for the Northern District of California, sitting by designation