Williams v. Holmes, 774 F.2d 1158 (5th Cir. 1985). · Go Syfert
Williams v. Holmes, 774 F.2d 1158 (5th Cir. 1985). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
40 citation events (4 in the last 25 years) across 7 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Kling v. Hebert (lamd, 2020-08-11)
Treatment trajectory · 1985 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1985 2005 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Kling v. Hebert
M.D. La. · 2020 · signal: see · confidence high
See Ford v. Stone, 599 F.Supp. 693 (M.D.La.1984), aff'd, 774 F.2d 1158 (5th Cir.1985) (holding that the plaintiff's state court petition failed to sufficiently assert federal claims so as to interrupt the limitations period).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Marshall C. Sasser
4th Cir. · 1992 · signal: see · confidence high
See Fisher v. Danos, 595 F.Supp. 461, 466-67 (E.D.La.1984), aff'd, 774 F.2d 1158 (5th Cir.1985).
cited Cited "see" Jimmie R. Rachal, Cross-Appellant v. Ingram Corporation, Cross-Appellee
5th Cir. · 1986 · signal: see · confidence high
See Fisher v. Danos, 671 F.2d 904, 906 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 840 , 103 S.Ct. 89 , 74 L.Ed.2d 83 (1982), aff'd after remand, 774 F.2d 1158 (5th Cir.1985).
discussed Cited "see" Greenslate v. Tenneco Oil Co.
E.D. La. · 1985 · signal: see · confidence high
See Fisher v. Danos, 774 F.2d 1158 , Slip op. at 9-11 (5th Cir.1985), aff'g 595 F.Supp. 461 (E.D.La.1984) (effect of release in admiralty cases is determined in accordance with federal law); See also Ingram Corp. v. J.
cited Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Sasser
D.S.C. · 1991 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Fisher v. Danos, 595 F.Supp. 461, 466-67 (E.D.La.1984), aff'd without op. 774 F.2d 1158 (5th Cir.1985).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Williams
v.
Holmes
84-3733.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.
Sep 16, 1985.
774 F.2d 1158
Published

774 F.2d 1158

* Williams
v.
Holmes

84-3733

United States Court of Appeals,
Fifth Circuit.

9/16/85

1

E.D.La.

AFFIRMED

2

---------------

* Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); 5th Cir.R. 34.2.