green
Positive treatment
2.9 score
Treatment trajectory · 1985 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1985
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Kling v. Hebert
See Ford v. Stone, 599 F.Supp. 693 (M.D.La.1984), aff'd, 774 F.2d 1158 (5th Cir.1985) (holding that the plaintiff's state court petition failed to sufficiently assert federal claims so as to interrupt the limitations period).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Marshall C. Sasser
See Fisher v. Danos, 595 F.Supp. 461, 466-67 (E.D.La.1984), aff'd, 774 F.2d 1158 (5th Cir.1985).
cited
Cited "see"
Jimmie R. Rachal, Cross-Appellant v. Ingram Corporation, Cross-Appellee
See Fisher v. Danos, 671 F.2d 904, 906 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 840 , 103 S.Ct. 89 , 74 L.Ed.2d 83 (1982), aff'd after remand, 774 F.2d 1158 (5th Cir.1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
Greenslate v. Tenneco Oil Co.
See Fisher v. Danos, 774 F.2d 1158 , Slip op. at 9-11 (5th Cir.1985), aff'g 595 F.Supp. 461 (E.D.La.1984) (effect of release in admiralty cases is determined in accordance with federal law); See also Ingram Corp. v. J.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Sasser
See, e.g., Fisher v. Danos, 595 F.Supp. 461, 466-67 (E.D.La.1984), aff'd without op. 774 F.2d 1158 (5th Cir.1985).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Williams
v.
Holmes
v.
Holmes
84-3733.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.
Sep 16, 1985.
774 F.2d 1158
Published
* Williams
v.
Holmes
84-3733
United States Court of Appeals,
Fifth Circuit.
9/16/85
1
E.D.La.
AFFIRMED
2
---------------
* Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); 5th Cir.R. 34.2.