green
Positive treatment
2.0 score
Treatment trajectory · 1985 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1985
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
In Re Grand Jury Proceedings
Appellees also cite Ex Parte Decious, 622 F.Supp. 40 (E.D.N.Y.), appeal dismissed, 779 F.2d 35 (2d Cir.1985) to support their proposition, even though the Decious court (which was in the district of seizure), in declining to exercise jurisdiction over the Rule 41(e) motion, noted that the movants still retained the right “to make a suppression motion in any district court where a trial is pending." Id. at 41 (emphasis added).
cited
Cited "see"
Nick v. Abrams
See Ex parte Decious, 622 F.Supp. 40 (E.D.N.Y.), appeal dismissed, 779 F.2d 35 (1985).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Zurica
v.
United States
v.
United States
85-2143.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.
Jul 17, 1985.
Published
Zurica
v.
U.S.
85-2143
United States Court of Appeals,
Second Circuit.
7/17/85
1
E.D.N.Y.
AFFIRMED