green
Positive treatment
1.7 score
Treatment trajectory · 1986 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1986
2006
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Turner
See United States v. $831,16045 United States Currency, 607 F.Supp. 1407, 1413-14 (N.D.Cal.1985), aff'd, 785 F.2d 317 (9th Cir.1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. One Hundred Twenty-Two Thousand Forty-Three Dollars
See also United States v. $831,160.45 United States Currency, 607 F.Supp. 1407, 1412-14 (N.D.Cal.1985) ("time of departure" is reached "when one is reasonably close, both spatially and temporally, to the physical point of departure itself, and manifests a definite commitment to leave"), aff'd, 785 F.2d 317 (9th Cir.1986) (mem.); United States v. Gomez Londono, 422 F.Supp. 519, 525 (E.D.N.Y.1976) (under currency reporting regulation, time of departure could not be reached until person actually boarded airplane or at least received boarding pass and was ready to board), rev'd on other grounds, 5…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. One Hundred Twenty-two Thousand Forty-three Dollars ($122,043.00) In United States Currency
See also United States v. $831,16045 United States Currency, 607 F.Supp. 1407, 1412-14 (N.D.Cal.1985) (“time of departure” is reached “when one is reasonably close, both spatially and temporally, to the physical point of departure itself, and manifests a definite commitment to leave”), affd, 785 F.2d 317 (9th Cir.1986) (mem.); United States v. Gomez Londono, 422 F.Supp. 519, 525 (E.D.N.Y.1976) (under currency reporting regulation, time of departure could not be reached until person actually boarded airplane or at least received boarding pass and was ready to board), rev’d on other gr…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
United States
v.
$831,160.45 U.S. Currency
v.
$831,160.45 U.S. Currency
84-2696.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
Feb 25, 1986.
785 F.2d 317
Cited by 2 opinions | Published
U.S.
v.
$831,160.45 U.S. Currency
84-2696
United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.
2/25/86
N.D.Cal., 607 F.Supp. 1407
AFFIRMED