Fondo v. Misodi, 788 F.2d 5 (2d Cir. 1986). · Go Syfert
Search
Fondo v. Misodi, 788 F.2d 5 (2d Cir. 1986). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“defendant has offered no exceptional facts showing that this forum selection clause should not be enforced”
54 citation events (5 in the last 25 years) across 13 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Preston Frankford Shopping Center Dallas, Tx. Ltd. Partnership v. Butler Dining Services, LLC (nywd, 2010-12-08)
Treatment trajectory · 1986 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1986 2006 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Preston Frankford Shopping Center Dallas, Tx. Ltd. Partnership v. Butler Dining Services, LLC
W.D.N.Y. · 2010 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
defendant has offered no exceptional facts showing that this forum selection clause should not be enforced
discussed Cited "see" Intermetals Corp. v. Hanover International Aktiengesellschaft Fur Industrieversicherungen
D.N.J. · 2001 · signal: see · confidence high
See Envirolite Enter., Inc. v. Glastechnische Industrie Peter Lisec Gesellschaft M.B.H., 53 B.R. 1007, 1012 (S.D.N.Y.1985) (holding that plaintiff failed to show that enforcement of forum selection clause was not unreasonable and unjust on grounds that costs of litigating in Austria were prohibitive), aff'd, 788 F.2d 5 (2d Cir.1986).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Fondo
v.
Misodi
85-7615.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.
Feb 13, 1986.
788 F.2d 5
Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 72%
Citer courts: W.D. New York (1)

788 F.2d 5

Fondo
v.
Misodi

85-7615, 85-7617

United States Court of Appeals,
Second Circuit.

2/13/86

1

S.D.N.Y.

AFFIRMED