discussed Cited "see" Pearson v. State (2×) See United States v. Moore, 786 F.2d 1308, 1313 , reh’g denied 791 F.2d 928 (5th Cir.1986); United States v. Downing, 753 F.2d 1224, 1231-32 (3rd Cir.1985); State v. Chappie, 135 Ariz. 281 , 660 P.2d 1208, 1220-24 (1983); People v. McDonald, 37 Cal.3d 351 , 208 Cal.Rptr. 236 , 690 P.2d 709, 726-27 (1984); and State v. Alger, 115 Idaho 42 , 764 P.2d 119, 127-28 (1988).

discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Leon Hudson and Reginald Smith See, e.g., United States v. Moore, 786 F.2d 1308, 1311-13 (5th Cir.), reh’g denied, 791 F.2d 928 (5th Cir.1986) (en banc) (although this type of testimony was formally considered inadmissible, it now is appropriate for consideration by the jury); United States v. Downing, 753 F.2d 1224, 1242-43 (3d Cir.1985) (even if the admission of this testimony otherwise satisfies Rule 702 (which should be determined after an on-the-record detailed proffer), it still can be excluded under Rule 403); United States v. Smith, 736 F.2d 1103 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 868 , 105 S.Ct. 213 , 83 L.Ed.2d …