green
Positive treatment
4.3 score
Treatment trajectory · 1986 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1986
2006
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Paul Warque & Marie Warque
See Barone v. Commissioner, 85 T.C. 462, 465 (1985), aff’d without published opinion, 807 F.2d 177 (9th Cir. 1986).6 Traveling expenses, including amounts expended for meals and lodging and the use of “listed property” (as defined in section 280F(d)(4) and including passenger automobiles) may be deducted under section 162(a)(2) if they are: (1) ordinary and necessary; (2) incurred while away from home; and (3) incurred in pursuit of a trade or business.
cited
Cited "see"
Madsen v. Comm'r
See Barone v. Commissioner, 85 T.C. 462 , 465 (1985) , affd. without published opinion 807 F.2d 177 (9th Cir. 1986) .
cited
Cited "see"
Lyle v. Commissioner
See Barone v. Commissioner, 85 T.C. 462 , 466 (1985) , affd. without published opinion 807 F.2d 177 (9th Cir. 1986) .
cited
Cited "see"
Edwards v. Commissioner
See Barone v. Commissioner, 85 T.C. 462 (1985) , affd. without published opinion 807 F.2d 177 (9th Cir. 1986) .
cited
Cited "see"
Marple
See Barone v. Commissioner, 85 T.C. 462 , 469 (1985) , affd. without published opinion 807 F.2d 177 (9th Cir. 1986) .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Akeem Adebayo Soboyede
See, e.g., Barone v. Commissioner, 85 T.C. 462 , 466 n.4 (1985) (concluding that the taxpayer’s reported “clothing expense” was “more properly characterized as a travel expense” for purposes of sec. 162), aff’d without published opinion, 807 F.2d 177 (9th Cir. 1986). 5 Petitioner testified that he worked remotely while in Nigeria but provided (continued...) -8- spent the remaining 35 unaccounted-for days in Minnesota, petitioner still physically spent more than 50% of his total working days in the Washington, D.C., area in 2015.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Jiri Cerny v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue Service
Accordingly, we held that "a taxpayer has a home [for purposes of section 162(a)(2) ] only when it appears that he has incurred substantial continuing living expenses at a permanent place of residence." Id. at 208 ; see also Barone v. Commissioner, 85 T.C. 462, 465 (1985), aff'd without published opinion, 807 F.2d 177 (9th Cir.1986). 5 The tax court's determination of the existence and location of a taxpayer's home for purposes of section 162(a)(2) is a determination of fact which will be overturned only if clearly erroneous.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Arizona Public Service
v.
Westinghouse Elec. Corp
v.
Westinghouse Elec. Corp
86-1587.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
Dec 10, 1986.
807 F.2d 177
Published
Arizona Public Service
v.
Westinghouse Elec. Corp.
85-2369, 86-1587
United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.
12/10/86
1
D.Ariz.
2
AFFIRMED IN PART, REVERSED IN PART, AND REMANDED