Lenson A. Hargrave v. Louie L. Wainwright, Sec'y, Dep't of Corr., State of Florida, 809 F.2d 1486 (11th Cir. 1987). · Go Syfert
Search
Lenson A. Hargrave v. Louie L. Wainwright, Sec'y, Dep't of Corr., State of Florida, 809 F.2d 1486 (11th Cir. 1987). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
13 citation events across 1 distinct court.
Strongest positive: Magill v. Dugger (ca11, 1987-07-28)
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Magill v. Dugger
11th Cir. · 1987 · signal: see · confidence high
See Hargrave v. Wainwright, 804 F.2d 1182 (11th Cir.1986) (Lockett does not constitute "novel" claim under Reed ), vacated for reh'g en banc, 809 F.2d 1486 (11th Cir.1987) Our resolution of this issue also makes it unnecesary for us to decide whether the imposition of a procedural bar in this case would constitute an independent and adequate state procedural ground.
cited Cited "see" Magill v. Dugger
11th Cir. · 1987 · signal: see · confidence high
See Hargrave v. Wainwright, 804 F.2d 1182 (11th Cir.1986) (Lockett does not constitute "novel" claim under Reed), vacated for reh’g en banc, 809 F.2d 1486 (11th Cir.1987).
discussed Cited "see" Michael Lindsey v. Fred Smith, Commissioner, Alabama Department of Corrections, J.D. White, Warden Holman Unit (2×)
11th Cir. · 1987 · signal: see · confidence high
See Hargrave v. Wainwright, 804 F.2d 1182 (11th Cir.1986), reh'g en banc granted, 809 F.2d 1486 (11th Cir.1987); see also Reed v. Ross, 468 U.S. 1 , 8 n. 5, 104 S.Ct. 2901 , 2906 n. 5, 82 L.Ed.2d 1 (1984) (declining to consider effect of state court's failure to rely explicitly on procedural bar).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Lenson A. HARGRAVE, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
Louie L. WAINWRIGHT, Secretary, Department of Corrections, State of Florida, Respondent-Appellee
84-5102.
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit.
Jan 26, 1987.
809 F.2d 1486
Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, Eleventh Judicial Circuit, Elliot H. Scherker, Asst. Public Defender, Miami, Fla., for petitioner-appellant., Carolyn Snurkowski, Asst. Atty. Gen., Miami, Fla., for respondent-appellee.
Roney, Godbold, Tjoflat, Hill, Fay, Vance, Kravitch, Johnson, Hatchett, Anderson, Clark, Edmondson.
Cited by 2 opinions  |  Published

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

(Opinion November 3, 1986, 11th Cir., 1986, 804 F.2d 1182).

Before RONEY, Chief Judge, GODBOLD, TJOFLAT, HILL, FAY, VANCE, KRAVITCH, JOHNSON, HATCHETT, ANDERSON, CLARK and EDMONDSON, Circuit Judges. BY THE COURT:

A member of this Court in active service having requested a poll on the application for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in this Court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that the cause shall be reheard by this Court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The previous panel’s opinion is hereby vacated.

The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of en banc briefs.