United States v. Calvin MacLin, 815 F.2d 80 (6th Cir. 1987). · Go Syfert
Search
United States v. Calvin MacLin, 815 F.2d 80 (6th Cir. 1987). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
43 citation events (3 in the last 25 years) across 7 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Tatum v. Cordis Corp. (tnmd, 1991-02-14)
Treatment trajectory · 1987 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1987 2006 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" Tatum v. Cordis Corp.
M.D. Tenn. · 1991 · signal: see · confidence high
See Higgs v. General Motors Corp., 655 F.Supp. 22, 26 (E.D.Tenn.1985), aff’d without op. sub nom., Thomas v. Subaru of America, Inc., 815 F.2d 80 (6th Cir.1987).
discussed Cited "see" Emma Taylor v. General Motors Corporation
11th Cir. · 1989 · signal: see · confidence high
See Higgs v. General Motors Corp., 655 F.Supp 22, 26 (E.D.Tenn.1985) (holding that consumer expectation test precludes a cause of action for failure to equip automobiles with airbags because, as a matter of law, the ordinary consumer would "not expect airbags to pop out of the dash”), aff'd without opinion, 815 F.2d 80 (6th Cir.1987); see also Hughes v. Ford Motor Co., 677 F.Supp. 76, 78 (D.Conn.1987) (same); Vanover V.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
United States
v.
Calvin MacLin
86-1212.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit.
Feb 20, 1987.
815 F.2d 80
Unpublished

815 F.2d 80

Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
Calvin MACLIN, Defendant-Appellant

No. 86-1212.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Feb. 20, 1987.

1

Before MERRITT and MILBURN, Circuit Judges, and PECK, Senior Circuit Judge

ORDER

2

For the reasons stated from the bench at oral argument on February 9, 1987, finding the notice of appeal to have been untimely filed; it is

3

ORDERED that the appeal be, and it hereby is, dismissed for lack of jurisdiction pursuant to Rule 9(b)(1), Rules of the Sixth Circuit.