Williams v. Hughes, 820 F.2d 1220 (4th Cir. 1987). · Go Syfert
Search
Williams v. Hughes, 820 F.2d 1220 (4th Cir. 1987). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
68 citation events (4 in the last 25 years) across 7 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Starr v. Commissioner (tax, 1991-12-10)
Treatment trajectory · 1987 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1987 2006 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" Starr v. Commissioner
Tax Ct. · 1991 · signal: see · confidence high
See Smith v. Commissioner , 78 T.C. 350 , 385-390 (1982) , affd. without published opinion 820 F.2d 1220 (4th Cir. 1987) .
cited Cited "see" Etshokin v. Commissioner
Tax Ct. · 1990 · signal: see · confidence high
See Smith v. Commissioner , 78 T.C. 350 , 356-357 (1982) , affd. without published opinion 820 F.2d 1220 (4th Cir. 1987) .
cited Cited "see" Kenneth P. Kirchman and Budagail S. Kirchman, Leo P. Ayotte and Nancy C. Ayotte v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
11th Cir. · 1989 · signal: see · confidence high
See Smith v. Commissioner, 78 T.C. 850 (1982), aff'd without opinion, 820 F.2d 1220 (4th Cir.1987).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Mitchell v. Crites
D. Maryland · 2021 · signal: see also · confidence low
See Davidson v. Cannon, 474 U.S. 344 , 347– 48 (1986); see also Pierce v. Davis, 820 F.2d 1220 (4th Cir. 1987) (“[I]t is clear that negligence alone is an insufficient basis for individual liability under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 [.]” (citations omitted)); Grayson v. Peed, 195 F.3d 692 , 695–96 (4th Cir. 1999) (“[T]he Constitution is designed to deal with deprivation of rights, not errors in judgment, even though such errors may have unfortunate consequences.”).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." SWF Real Estate LLC v. Comm'r
Tax Ct. · 2015 · signal: see also · confidence low
This Court has considered the following factors in considering whether a transfer of the benefits and burdens of ownership has occurred: (1) whether legal title passed; (2) how the parties treated the transaction; (3) whether an equity interest in the property was acquired; (4) whether the contract created a present obligation on the seller to execute and deliver a deed and a present obligation on the purchaser to make payments; (5) whether the right of possession was vested in the purchasers; (6) which party paid the property tax; (7) which party bore the risk of loss or damage to the propert…
cited Cited "see, e.g." Zegeer v. Commissioner
Tax Ct. · 1987 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Smith v. Commissioner, 78 T.C. 350 , 392 n.32 (1982) , affd. without opinion 820 F.2d 1220 (4th Cir. 1987) .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Joseph Williams
v.
Harry Hughes, Governor of Maryland Jon P. Galley, Commissioner George H. Collins, Warden Wayne S. Barry Robert W. Antelman Nurse McKenzie Clara Culbert Barb Welsh P.A.M. Johnson Sergeant Montgomery Officer Peguese Lieutenant Ebert Lieutenant Robinson Lester Wright Major Hansen
87-7526.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.
Jun 8, 1987.
820 F.2d 1220
Unpublished

820 F.2d 1220
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Joseph WILLIAMS, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Harry HUGHES, Governor of Maryland; Jon P. Galley,
Commissioner; George H. Collins, Warden; Wayne S. Barry;
Robert W. Antelman; Nurse McKenzie; Clara Culbert; Barb
Welsh; P.A.M. Johnson; Sergeant Montgomery; Officer
Peguese; Lieutenant Ebert; Lieutenant Robinson; Lester
Wright; Major Hansen, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 87-7526.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted March 30, 1987.
Decided June 8, 1987.

Before RUSSELL, WIDENER and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.

1

Joseph Williams, appellant pro se.

2

Richard M. Kastendieck, Stephen Howard Sachs, Attorney General, Office of the Attorney General of Maryland, for appellees Hughes, Galley, Collins, McKenzie, Welsh, Montgomery, Peguese, Ebert, Robinson, Wright and Hansen.

3

E. Fremont Magee, Pamela K. Loya, Piper & Marbury, for appellee Barry.

4

Charles Russell Fields, Simmons & Fields, for appellee Culbert.

PER CURIAM:

5

Joseph Williams, a Maryland inmate, seeks to appeal the judgment of the district court dismissing his civil action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983. The district court entered final judgment in this case on November 19, 1986. Williams noted his appeal on December 29, 1986, forty days after entry of judgment and ten days later than the period prescribed by Fed.R.App.P. 4(a)(1).

6

Under Fed.R.App.P. 4(a)(1), an appeal must be noted within thirty days after the entry of judgment. Under Fed.R.App.P. 4(1)(5), a district court, "upon a showing of excusable neglect or good cause, may extend the time for filing a notice of appeal upon motion filed not later than thirty days after the expiration [of the appeal period]." Absent a request for extension of the appeal period, a notice of appeal filed in this second thirty-day period is untimely and ineffective to confer appellate jurisdiction. Shah v. Hutto, 722 F.2d 1167 (4th Cir.1983) (en banc), cert. denied, 466 U.S. 975 (1984). Williams failed to request an extension of the appeal period under Fed.R.App.P. 4(a)(5). Therefore this Court lacks jurisdiction to hear Williams' appeal.

7

Because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively, we dispense with oral argument and dismiss this case for lack of jurisdiction.

8

DISMISSED.