Anthony Hinkston v. Terry L. Morris, 841 F.2d 1126 (6th Cir. 1988). · Go Syfert
Search
Anthony Hinkston v. Terry L. Morris, 841 F.2d 1126 (6th Cir. 1988). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
52 citation events (9 in the last 25 years) across 14 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Edward Abney, Barbara Allen, James Day, Robert Green, Delbert Jackson, James Pugh, Roger L. Thacker, and Daniel Hunter Webster v. Amgen, Inc. (ca6, 2006-03-29)
Treatment trajectory · 1988 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1988 2007 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Edward Abney, Barbara Allen, James Day, Robert Green, Delbert Jackson, James Pugh, Roger L. Thacker, and Daniel Hunter Webster v. Amgen, Inc.
6th Cir. · 2006 · signal: see · confidence high
See Monsanto Co. v. Manning, 841 F.2d 1126 , 1988 WL 19169, at *6 (6th Cir. Mar. 8, 1998); Heideman v. South Salt Lake City, 348 F.3d 1182, 1189 (10th Cir.2003) (citing Wisconsin Gas Co. v. FERC, 758 F.2d 669, 674 (D.C.Cir. 1985)).
discussed Cited "see" Abney v. Amgen
6th Cir. · 2006 · signal: see · confidence high
See Monsanto Co. v. Manning, 841 F.2d 1126 , 1998 WL 19169 , at *6 (6th Cir. Mar. 8, 1998); Heideman v. South Salt Lake City, 348 F.3d 1182, 1189 (10th Cir. 2003) (citing Wisconsin Gas Co. v. FERC, 758 F.2d 669 , 674 (D.C.
cited Cited "see" Vest v. Commissioner
Tax Ct. · 1993 · signal: see · confidence high
See Koziara v. Commissioner , 86 T.C. 999 , 1006-1007 (1986) , affd. 841 F.2d 1126 (6th Cir. 1988) ; Dorothy C.
cited Cited "see" Estate of Reinke v. Commissioner
Tax Ct. · 1993 · signal: see · confidence high
See Koziara v. Commissioner , 86 T.C. 999 , 1006-1007 (1986) , affd. without published opinion 841 F.2d 1126 (6th Cir. 1988) .
cited Cited "see" Timothy Allan Divers v. Department of Corrections Jim M. Jones, Larry Dittmer
8th Cir. · 1990 · signal: see · confidence high
See Knop v. Johnson, 667 F.Supp. 467 (W.D.Mich.1987), appeal dismissed 841 F.2d 1126 (6th Cir.1988).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Tranchmontagne v. United States Department of Housing and Urban Development
E.D. Mich. · 2021 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Monsanto Co. v. Manning, 841 F.2d 1126 , 1988 WL 19169, at *4 (6th Cir. Mar. 8, 1988) (table case) (“It is error to grant a preliminary injunction if the party has no chance or a very slight chance of prevailing on the merits, no matter how strong the balance of irreparable harms may incline in favor of the party seeking the injunction.”); Fialka- Feldman v. Oakland Univ.
cited Cited "see, e.g." Pater v. Health Care and Retirement Corp.
S.D. Ohio · 1992 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Lafferty v. Coopers & Lybrand, 841 F.2d 1126 (6th Cir.1988) (unpublished opinion available on WESTLAW, 1988 WL 19182 , and LEXIS, 1988 U.S.App.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Anthony Hinkston
v.
Terry L. Morris
87-3580.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit.
Mar 2, 1988.
841 F.2d 1126
Unpublished

841 F.2d 1126

Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
Anthony HINKSTON, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
Terry L. MORRIS, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 87-3580.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

March 2, 1988.

Before ENGEL, MERRITT and CORNELIA G. KENNEDY, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

1

The respondent moves to remand this appeal taken from the district court's order dismissing the petition for a writ of habeas corpus. 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254. This appeal has been referred to a panel of the court pursuant to Rule 9(a), Rules of the Sixth Circuit. After an examination of the record and the petitioner's brief, this panel unanimously agrees that oral argument is not needed. Fed.R.App.P. 34(a).

2

A Cincinnati, Ohio jury convicted the petitioner of breaking and entering and four counts of aggravated robbery. He received a ten to twenty-five year sentence. The district court dismissed the petition for failure to exhaust state remedies.

3

The respondent's motion to remand concedes that the petitioner did exhaust his state remedies. A review of documents accompanying petitioner's motion to amend the district court's order also reveals that petitioner appealed his conviction to the state appellate court and the state supreme court. Exhaustion is not a jurisdictional issue. Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 684 (1984). Accordingly, we conclude this habeas petition should not have been dismissed for failure to exhaust available state remedies.

4

The motion for a remand is granted. The order of the district court is vacated and the case is remanded for further proceedings. Rule 9(b)(6), Rules of the Sixth Circuit.