green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
3.4 score
“hostile behavior that does not bespeak an unlawful motive cannot support a hostile work environment claim.”
Treatment trajectory · 1988 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1988
2007
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 11 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Massey v. Connecticut Mental Health Center, No. 96-0388542 S (Jul. 31, 1998)
hostile behavior that does not bespeak an unlawful motive cannot support a hostile work environment claim.
discussed
Cited "see"
Zelinski v. Pennsylvania State Police
See Miller v. Aluminum Co. of Am., 679 F.Supp. 495, 502 (W.D.Pa.), aff'd, 856 F.2d 184 (3d Cir.1988)(“Snubs and unjust criticisms of one’s work are not poisonous enough to create an actionable hostile work environment.”).
cited
Cited "see"
Michael SURACE; Alice Surace, H/w, Appellants, v. CATERPILLAR, INC.; CMI Corporation, Appellees
Id. at 91, 578 A.2d at 421 ; accord Miller v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 679 F.Supp. 485, 489 (E.D.Pa.1988), aff'd, 856 F.2d 184 (3d Cir.1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
Keenan v. Allan
See, Miller v. Aluminum Co. of America, 679 F.Supp. 495, 502 (W.D.Pa.), aff'd without op., 856 F.2d 184 (3d Cir.1988) ("Hostile behavior that does not bespeak an unlawful motive cannot support a hostile work environment claim”) (citing other authority); McCollum v. Bolger, 794 F.2d 602, 611 (11th Cir.1986), cert. denied, sub *1374 nom.
cited
Cited "see"
Acrey v. American Sheep Industry Ass'n
See Miller v. Aluminum Co., 679 F.Supp. 495, 501-02 (W.D.Pa.1988), aff'd, 856 F.2d 184 (3d Cir.1988).
cited
Cited "see"
Kapusta v. Rockwood Area School District
See Miller v. Aluminum Company of America, 679 F.Supp. 495, 500 (W.D.Pa.) aff’d 856 F.2d 184 (3d Cir.1988).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Stitt v. Philip Morris, Inc.
See, e.g., Miller v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 679 F.Supp. 485 (E.D.Pa.) (holding that under Pennsylvania law the risk-utility theory was inapplicable and therefore, plaintiff could not maintain an action against cigarette manufacturer for death caused by cigarette smoking on grounds that cigarettes gave no benefit to society but impose great risk), aff'd, 856 F.2d 184 (3d Cir.1988); Gunsalus v. Celotex Corp., 674 F.Supp. 1149, 1158-59 (E.D.Pa.1987) (holding that Pennsylvania had not adopted the risk-utility test and that tobacco was not per se a “defective” product merely because …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Tammy S. Scusa v. Nestle U.S. A. Company, Inc., Doing Business as Friskies Petcare Co., Inc.
See also Miller v. Aluminum Co. of America, 679 F.Supp. 495, 505 (W.D.Pa.1988) (snubbing by supervisors does not amount to unlawful retaliation), aff'd, 856 F.2d 184 (3d Cir.1988) (table); cf. Ross v. Glickman, 125 F.3d 859 (9th Cir.1997) (table) (per curiam) (No. 96-16527) (slip op. at 4) (shunning by office staff not actionable hostile work environment under Title VII).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Moore v. Grove North America, Inc.
“If the nature of an employee’s environment, however unpleasant, is not due to her gender, she has not been the victim of sex discrimination as a result of that environment.” Gross v. Burggraf Const. Co., 53 F.3d 1531 , 1537 (10th Cir.1995) (emphasis in original) (citing Stahl v. Sun Microsystems, Inc., 19 F.3d 533, 538 (10th Cir.1994)); see also Miller v. Aluminum Co. of America, 679 F.Supp. 495, 502 (W.D.Pa.) (“Snubs and unjust criticisms are not poisonous enough to create an actionable hostile working environment____ Hostile behavior that does not bespeak an unlawful motive cannot s…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Thomson v. Olson
See, e.g., Miller v. Aluminum Co., 679 F.Supp. 495, 501 (W.D.Pa.), aff'd, 856 F.2d 184 (3d Cir.1988); Candelore v. Clark County Sanitation Dist., 752 F.Supp. 956, 960-61 (D.Nev.1990), aff'd, 975 F.2d 588 (9th Cir.1992); Autry v. North Carolina Dep’t of Human Resources, 820 F.2d 1384, 1386-87 (4th Cir.1987) (following DeCintio).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Velasquez v. Franz
(2×)
See, e.g., Printing-Mart-Morristown, Inc. v. Rosenthal, 650 F.Supp. 1444 , 1448 n. 7 (D.N.J.1987), aff'd, 856 F.2d 184 (3d Cir.1988); Advance Piece Dye Works v. Travelers Indem.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Shinn (Cecilia Ann)
v.
U.S. Department of Army
v.
U.S. Department of Army
88-5209.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit.
Jul 7, 1988.
Published
Citer courts: Connecticut Superior Court (1)
Shinn (Cecilia Ann)
v.
U.S. Department of Army
NO. 88-5209
United States Court of Appeals,
Third Circuit.
JUL 07, 1988
Appeal From: D.N.J.,
Brown, J.
1
AFFIRMED.