green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 4×
115.5 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 2 distinct cases ·
…diversity must be established at the time of removal
at p. 1166
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1988 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1988
2007
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 50 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (verbatim quote)
Caribe Chem Distributors, Corp. v. Southern Agricultural Insecticides, Inc.
(2×)
also: Cited as authority (rule)
case may . . . not be removable depending on whether the non-diverse party is eliminated from the state action by voluntary or involuntary dismissal.
discussed
Cited as authority (verbatim quote)
Raines v. Davis
diversity must be established at the time of removal
discussed
Cited as authority (verbatim quote)
Raines v. Davis
diversity must be established at the time of removal
discussed
Cited as authority (verbatim quote)
West Virginia Ex Rel. McGraw v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co.
diversity must be established at the time of removal.
examined
Cited as authority (rule)
Tova Louie, individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Ahuva Saghi, et al. v. Ice Cream House, LLC, et al.
(3×)
DuPont de Nemours & Co., 863 F.2d 1162, 1166 (4th Cir. 1988).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Sharise Parker v. Children's National Medical Center, Inc.
DuPont de Nemours & Co., 863 F.2d 1162, 1167 (4th Cir. 1988).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Dubois v. Branch
DuPont de Nemours & Co., 863 F.2d 1162, 1166 (4th Cir. 1988); see also Wis. Dep’t of Corr. v. Schacht, 524 U.S. 381, 391 (1998) (holding that a case must fall “within the ‘original jurisdiction’ of the federal court”).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
McDerment v. Sychrony Bank
Dupont de Nemours & Co., 863 F.2d 1162, 1166 (4th Cir.1998).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Morgan v. Richard A Bauer
DuPont de Nemours & Co., 863 F.2d 1162, 1166 (4th Cir. 1988); see also Wis. Dep’t of Corr. v. Schacht, 524 U.S. 381, 391 (1998) (holding that a case must fall “within the ‘original jurisdiction’ of the federal court”).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Cannon v. Progressive Global Energy, Inc.
DuPont de Nemours & Co., 863 F.2d 1162, 1166 (4th Cir. 1988); see also Wis. Dep’t of Corr. v. Schacht, 524 U.S. 381, 391 (1998) (holding that a case must fall “within the ‘original jurisdiction’ of the federal court”).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Felton v. CSX Transportation, Inc.
DuPont de Nemours & Co., 863 F.2d 1162, 1166 (4th Cir. 1988) (recognizing that, “[a]lthough disagreement exists whether the involuntary/voluntary distinction survived the 1949 amendment to § 1446, the trend appears to retain the distinction”) (dictum); Poulos v. Naas Foods, Inc., 959 F.2d 69, 72 (7th Cir. 1992) (“[W]hen Congress referred to ‘a case which is or has become removable,’ in section 1446(b), Congress apparently intended to incorporate the existing definition of ‘removable,’ a definition that included the voluntary[-]involuntary rule.”); Davis v. McCourt, 226 F.3d 50…
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Blue Ridge Paper Products LLC v. Industrial Services Group, Inc.
(2×)
also: Cited "see"
DuPont de Nemours & Co., 863 F.2d 1162, 1166 (4th Cir. 1988).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Asbury v. Pocahontas Coal Company LLC
Dupont de Nemours & Co., 863 F.2d 1162, 1166 (4th Cir.1998).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Active Resources, Inc. v. Hagewood
Dupont de Nemours & Co., 863 F.2d 1162, 1166 (4th Cir.1998).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Adkins v. BioTE Medical, LLC
Dupont de Nemours & Co., 863 F.2d 1162, 1166 (4th Cir.1998).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Jeffries v. BioTE Medical, LLC
Dupont de Nemours & Co., 863 F.2d 1162, 1166 (4th Cir.1998).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
WALLS v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY
DuPont De Nemours & Co., 863 F.2d 1162, 1167 (4th Cir. 1988)).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Robinson v. Pennsylvania National Mutual Casualty Insurance Company
DuPont de Nemours & Co., 863 F.2d 1162, 1166 (4th Cir. 1988); see also Wis. Dep’t of Corr. v. Schacht, 524 U.S. 381, 391 (1998) (holding that a case must fall “within the ‘original jurisdiction’ of the federal court”).
examined
Cited as authority (rule)
Johnson v. Team Washington, Inc.
(3×)
also: Cited "see"
The Baccous Estate Turning first to the Baccous Estate, although the Johnsons have since dismissed their claims against the Baccous Estate, because “[d]iversity must be established at the time of removal,” Higgins, 863 F.2d at 1166, that dismissal does not moot the question of whether the inclusion of the Baccous Estate as a defendant rendered the parties non-diverse and removal improper.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Valverde v. Maxum Casualty Insurance Company
(2×)
DuPont de Nemours & Co., 863 F.2d 1162, 1166 (4th Cir. 1988); Weems v. Louis Dreyfus Corp., 380 F.2d 545, 548 (5th Cir. 1967); In re Iowa Mfg.
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
West Virginia Potato Chip Company, LLC v. Erie Insurance Property & Casualty Company
Dupont de Nemours & Co., 863 F.2d 1162, 1166 (4th Cir.1998).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Melange Cafe LLC v. Erie Insurance Property & Casualty Company
Dupont de Nemours & Co., 863 F.2d 1162, 1166 (4th Cir.1998).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Scott v. Southern Health Partners, Inc.
DuPont de Nemours & Co., 863 F.2d 1162, 1166 (4th Cir.1988).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Persinger v. Lowe's Home Centers, LLC
Dupont de Nemours & Co., 863 F.2d 1162, 1166 (4th Cir.1998).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Hollenbeck v. Trikilis
DuPont de Nemours & Co., 863 F.2d 1162, 1166 (4th Cir. 1988).
examined
Cited as authority (rule)
Boggs v. 3M Company
(3×)
Dupont de 2 Section 1441 states in pertinent part: Except as otherwise expressly provided by Act of Congress, any civil action brought in a State court of which the district courts of the United States have original jurisdiction, may be removed by the defendant or the defendants, to the district court of the United States for the district and division embracing the place where such action is pending. 28 U.S.C. § 1441 (a). 2 Nemours & Co., 863 F.2d 1162, 1166 (4th Cir.1998).
examined
Cited as authority (rule)
Puffinberger v. 3M Company
(3×)
Dupont de Nemours & Co., 863 F.2d 1162, 1166 (4th Cir.1998).
examined
Cited as authority (rule)
Swiger v. A.R. Wilfley & Sons, Inc.
(3×)
Dupont de Nemours & Co., 863 F.2d 1162, 1166 (4th Cir.1998).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Lindsey Hoyt v. Lane Construction Corporati
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
DuPont de Nemours & Co., 863 F.2d 1162, 1166 (4th Cir. 1988) (explaining a “non-diverse party is eliminated from the state action by voluntary or involuntary dismissal” in state court).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Rice v. Safeco Insurance Company of America
DuPont de Nemours & Co., 863 F.2d 1162, 1166 (4th Cir. 1988).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Employers' Innovative Network, LLC v. Bridgeport Benefits, Inc.
Dupont de Nemours & Co., 863 F.2d 1162, 1166 (4th Cir.1998).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Lockhart v. Dolgencorp, LLC
Dupont de Nemours & Co., 863 F.2d 1162, 1166 (4th Cir.1998).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Rowe v. Peoples Bancorp, Inc.
Dupont de Nemours & Co., 863 F.2d 1162, 1166 (4th Cir.1998).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Gabe v. Dolgencorp, LLC
Dupont de Nemours & Co., 863 F.2d 1162, 1166 (4th Cir.1998).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Bobbydyne McMillan v. Cumberland County Board of Ed.
DuPont de Nemours & Co., 863 F.2d 1162, 1167 (4th Cir. 1988).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Bobbydyne McMillan v. Cumberland County Board of Ed.
DuPont de Nemours & Co., 863 F.2d 1162, 1167 (4th Cir. 1988).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Harms v. Ditech Financial LLC
Dupont de Nemours & Co., 863 F.2d 1162, 1166 (4th Cir.1998).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Estate of Wayne A. Jones v. City of Martinsburg, WV
DuPont de Nemours & Co., 863 F.2d 1162, 1167 (4th Cir. 1988)).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Dempsey v. Nationstar Mortgage LLC
Dupont de Nemours & Co., 863 F.2d 1162, 1166 (4th Cir.1998).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Johnson v. Pinnacle Mining Company, LLC
Dupont de Nemours & Co., 863 F.2d 1162, 1166 (4th Cir.1998).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Brian C. Lee, Sr. v. Town of Seaboard
DuPont de Nemours & Co., 863 F.2d 1162, 1167 (4th Cir. 1988).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
In re Council of Unit Owners of the 100 Harborview Drive Condominium
DuPont de Nemours & Co., 863 F.2d 1162, 1166 (4th Cir.1988); see generally 14 A Charles Alan Wright et al., Fed.
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
UDX, LLC v. Heavner
DuPont de Nemours & Co., 863 F.2d 1162, 1166 (4th Cir.1988).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Walter E. Campbell Co., Inc. v. Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc
DuPont de Nemours & Co., 863 F.2d 1162, 1166 (4th Cir.1988); Insinga, 845 F.2d at 252-55 ; Gould v. Mut.
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Deerfeild Plantation Phase II-B Property Owners Ass'n v. United States Army Corps of Engineers
DuPont de Nemours & Co., 863 F.2d 1162, 1167 (4th Cir.1988).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Charles W. Ross Builder, Inc. v. Olsen Fine Home Building, LLC
DuPont de Nemours & Co., 863 F.2d 1162, 1167 (4th Cir.1988).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Maureene Stanley v. The Huntington National Bank
DuPont de Nemours & Co., 863 F.2d 1162, 1167 (4th Cir.1988), and examine the evidence in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party while drawing all reasonable inferences in her favor, see Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S. 242, 255 , 106 S.Ct. 2505 , 91 L.Ed.2d 202 (1986).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Joseph Larosa v. Virgil Larosa
(2×)
DuPont de Nemours & Co., 863 F.2d 1162, 1167 (4th Cir.1988).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Buchanan County v. EQUITABLE PRODUCTION CO.
DuPont de Nemours & Co., 863 F.2d 1162, 1166 (4th Cir.1988).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Tsai v. Maryland Aviation
DuPont de Nemours & Co., 863 F.2d 1162, 1167 (4th Cir.1988), and view the facts in the light most favorable to the non-moving party.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Russell T. Jackson
v.
Toni v. Bair Fred E. Jordan, Regional Administrator, Virginia Department of Corrections E.C. Morris Edward W. Murray Allyn R. Sielaff
v.
Toni v. Bair Fred E. Jordan, Regional Administrator, Virginia Department of Corrections E.C. Morris Edward W. Murray Allyn R. Sielaff
87-3827.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.
Dec 20, 1988.
863 F.2d 1162
Published
Russell T. JACKSON, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Toni V. BAIR; Fred E. Jordan, Regional Administrator,
Virginia Department of Corrections; E.C. Morris;
Edward W. Murray; Allyn R. Sielaff,
Defendants-Appellees.
No. 87-3827.
United States Court of Appeals,
Fourth Circuit.
Dec. 20, 1988.
ORDER
[*~1162]1
The panel opinion, Jackson v. Bair, 851 F.2d 714 (4 Cir.1988), having been withdrawn and the case reargued in banc, it is ORDERED
[*~1167]2
That the judgment of the district court is affirmed by an equally divided court.