green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
4.6 score
“i must not construe the criminal statute so strictly as to defeat the obvious intention of the legislature. . . . nor may i manufacture ambiguity to invoke the rule of lenity so as to defeat that intent”
Treatment trajectory · 1988 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1988
2007
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Commonwealth v. Tata
i must not construe the criminal statute so strictly as to defeat the obvious intention of the legislature. . . . nor may i manufacture ambiguity to invoke the rule of lenity so as to defeat that intent
cited
Cited "see"
Ambrose v. United States
See Blackman v. Comm’r of Internal Revenue, 88 T.C. 677 (1987), aff'd, 867 F.2d 605 (1st Cir.1988). .
discussed
Cited "see"
Rohrs v. Comm'r
See Blackman v. Commissioner , 88 T.C. 677 (1987) (arson), affd. without published opinion 867 F.2d 605 (1st Cir. 1988) ; Holt v. Commissioner , 69 T.C. 75 (1977) (drug trafficking), affd. per curiam 611 F.2d 1160 (5th Cir. 1980) ; Mazzei v. Commissioner , 61 T.C. 497 (1974) (counterfeiting); Towers v. Commissioner , 24 T.C. 199 (1955) (extortion payment), affd. 247 F.2d 233 (2d Cir. 1957) , affd. on other grounds sub nom.
discussed
Cited "see"
De Cou v. Commissioner
(2×)
See Blackman v. Commissioner , 88 T.C. 677 , 681-682 (1987) , *62 affd. without published opinion 867 F.2d 605 (1st Cir. 1988) ; White v. Commissioner , 48 T.C. 430 , 435 (1967) ; Heyn v. Commissioner , 46 T.C. 302 , 308 (1966) .
discussed
Cited "see"
Stephens v. Commissioner
(2×)
See Blackman v. Commissioner , 88 T.C. 677 (1987) , affd. without published opinion 867 F.2d 605 (1st Cir. 1988) ; Rev.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
United States
v.
Gomez (Luis Norbert)
v.
Gomez (Luis Norbert)
87-1918.
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit.
Oct 4, 1988.
Published
Citer courts: Massachusetts Appeals Court (1)
U.S.
v.
Gomez (Luis Norbert)
NO. 87-1918
United States Court of Appeals,
First Circuit.
OCT 04, 1988
1
Appeal From: D.R.I.
2
DISMISSED.