Hartman v. Arlington Cnty., 903 F.2d 290 (4th Cir. 1990). · Go Syfert
Hartman v. Arlington Cnty., 903 F.2d 290 (4th Cir. 1990). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
38 citation events (6 in the last 25 years) across 19 distinct courts.
Treatment trajectory · 1991 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1991 2008 2026
Cited for
At page 292 Affirming exemption from overtime requirements for fire commanders2 citing cases“on the reasoning of the lower court”1 citing court quotes it
  • Masters v. City of Huntington, 800 F. Supp. 363 (S.D. W. Va. 1992).published
    “on the reasoning of the lower court”
  • Keller v. City of Columbus, Ind., 778 F. Supp. 1480 (S.D. Ind. 1991).published
    City of Atlanta, 920 F.2d at 805 ; Hartman, 903 F.2d at 292; City of Alexandria, 720 F.Supp. at 1233 ; Sarver v. City of Roanoke, No. 88-0179-R, 1990 WL 83327 (W.D.Va.
At page 291 fire shift commander was a bona fide executive within meaning of FLSA1 citing case1 citing court put it this way
Other citing cases6 with no pin cite or quoted language on record
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
William Ronald HARTMAN Peter Angel Vazquez Lewis A. Cooper Stanley B. Bower William O. Moose Elbert F. Green Ray W. Swarthout Michael J. Smith John P. McWilliams John A. Maruca William Scott McKay Charles G. Middleton William N. Moultne James W. Trollinger Howard N. Piansky James E. Kiser Donald M. Keys Terry W. Greenfield Robert S. Ditrapani Thomas McGlatnery Charles B. Marcus Richard G. Slusher Richard M. Tooley Joseph Arbogast John T. Lightfoot Roy L. Jackson William McClintock Judith A. Brewer Michael Dove David P. Bell Floyd L. Walters, Jr. M. William Ames Robert W. Cornwell, Robert T. Cuff, Jr.
v.
ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA
No. 89-3507.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.
May 3, 1990.
Published opinion
903 F.2d 290
1990 WL 56004
Gregory Keith McGillivary, and Thomas A. Woodley, on brief, Mulholland & Hickey, Washington, D.C., for plaintiffs-appellants., Peter Harlan Maier, Asst. County Atty., Arlington, Va., James P. McEUigott, Jr., Scott S. Cairns, McGuire, Woods, Battle & Boothe, Richmond, Va., on briefs, for defendant-appellee.
Butzner, Ervin, Wilkinson.
Cited by 4 opinions  |  Published
ERVIN, Chief Judge:

Current and former employees of the Arlington County, Virginia Fire Department (“Fire Shift Commanders”) brought this suit against Arlington County, Virginia, seeking declaratory, injunctive, and monetary relief, claiming that they were entitled to overtime compensation from Arlington County under the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. §§ 201 et seq. (“FLSA”). District Judge Claude M. Hilton granted summary judgment in favor of Arlington County after determining that the Fire Shift Commanders are exempt from the overtime requirements of the FLSA under section 213(a)(1) because they are employed in an executive capacity: they are salaried employees who are paid more than $250 a week, they direct the activity of two or more firefighters on the shift, and their primary duty is the management of the fire station. See 29 C.F.R. § 541.1(f). The Fire Shift Commanders appeal that judgment.

We note that this is not the first time that the lower courts have been asked to apply the FLSA overtime provisions to Virginia fire captains. Several lower courts have been presented with similar disputes. See Int’l Ass’n of Firefighters v. City of Alexandria, 720 F.Supp. 1230 (E.D.Va.1989), appeals docketed, Nos. 89-2497, 89-2498 (4th Cir.1989); Sarver v. City of Roanoke, C/A No. 88-0179-R (W.D.Va. June 15, 1989); Chadwick v. City of Norfolk, C/A No. 88-248-N (E.D.Va. Dec. 19, 1988); Harkins v. Chesapeake, C/A No. 88-254-N (E.D.Va. Dec. 2, 1988). Like the lower court in this case, these courts have[*292] held that the fire captains were exempt employees.

We agree with the district court that the Fire Shift Commanders in this case are exempt from the FLSA overtime requirements. After reviewing the record and briefs, and after hearing oral arguments, we find that there are no material facts in dispute and that summary judgment was properly granted for the County. We affirm on the reasoning of the lower court. Hartman v. Arlington County, Virginia, 720 F.Supp. 1227 (E.D.Va.1989).

AFFIRMED.