Edward S. Kraemer v. Edward Kraemer & Sons, Inc., David R. Kraemer, 951 F.2d 349 (6th Cir. 1991). · Go Syfert
Search
Edward S. Kraemer v. Edward Kraemer & Sons, Inc., David R. Kraemer, 951 F.2d 349 (6th Cir. 1991). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“for purposes of appeal, an order is final if it 'ends the litigation on the merits and leaves nothing for the court to do but execute the judgment.”
50 citation events (15 in the last 25 years) across 13 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: National City Bank v. Plechaty (In Re Plechaty) (bap6, 1997-10-07)
Treatment trajectory · 1991 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1991 2008 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) National City Bank v. Plechaty (In Re Plechaty)
6th Cir. BAP · 1997 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
for purposes of appeal, an order is final if it 'ends the litigation on the merits and leaves nothing for the court to do but execute the judgment.
cited Cited "see" Irwin v. O'Bryan (In Re O'Bryan)
Bankr. E.D. Ky. · 1995 · signal: see · confidence high
See In re Bathalter, 123 B.R. 568 (S.D.Ohio 1990), affirmed National Acceptance Co. of America v. Bathalter, 951 F.2d 349 , 1991 WL 263474 (6th Cir.1991).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Robinson v. Stegall
E.D. Mich. · 2001 · signal: see also · confidence low
Id.; See also Johnson v. Abramajtys, 951 F.2d 349 , 1991 WL 270829, *9 (6 th Cir. Dec. 17, 1991)(Michigan Sentencing Guidelines are not mandatory, do not create substantive rights, and are merely a tool used to assist the sentencing judge in the exercise of discretion).
cited Cited "see, e.g." Murray v. Wilcox (In Re Wilcox)
Bankr. N.D. Ohio · 1998 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also National Acceptance Co. of America v. Bathalter, 951 F.2d 349 (6th Cir.1991).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Edward S. Kraemer
v.
Edward Kraemer & Sons, Inc., David R. Kraemer
91-3505.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit.
Dec 19, 1991.
951 F.2d 349
Unpublished
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 86%
Citer courts: Sixth Circuit (1)

951 F.2d 349

58 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 336

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
Edward S. KRAEMER, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
EDWARD KRAEMER & SONS, INC., David R. Kraemer, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 91-3505.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Dec. 19, 1991.

Before DAVID A. NELSON and SUHRHEINRICH, Circuit Judges, and ENGEL, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM.

1

Edward Kraemer appeals from a summary judgment ruling in this employment discrimination and breach of contract action. Edward describes his termination as a violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, 29 U.S.C. §§ 621-624, and as prohibited by a stock purchase agreement guaranteed by defendant David R. Kraemer, Edward's brother, and by the family business, Kraemer & Sons.

2

After careful review of the record and the briefs of the parties, we find Edward's claims to be without merit. We affirm the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in its opinion of May 8, 1991.