Stephen Moore v. Harlan Bockman, John E. Popovich, & Lucinda Bruner, 953 F.2d 1391 (10th Cir. 1992). · Go Syfert
Search
Stephen Moore v. Harlan Bockman, John E. Popovich, & Lucinda Bruner, 953 F.2d 1391 (10th Cir. 1992). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
38 citation events (3 in the last 25 years) across 8 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Norman E. Duquette, Inc. v. Commissioner (dcd, 2000-08-25)
Treatment trajectory · 1992 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1992 2009 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Norman E. Duquette, Inc. v. Commissioner
D.D.C. · 2000 · signal: see · confidence high
See Morgan v. United States, 953 F.2d 1391 (10th Cir.1992) (unpublished), 1992 WL 14934 ; Wilkerson v. United States, 839 F.Supp. 440, 444 (E.D.Tex.1993); Brown v. United States, 755 F.Supp. 285, 286-87 (N.D.Cal.1990); Haywood v. United States, 642 F.Supp. 188, 192 (D.Kan.1986).
discussed Cited "see" Sharon Steel Corp. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.
Utah · 1997 · signal: see · confidence high
See Canadian Indemnity Co. v. K & T, Inc., 745 F.Supp. 661, 663-64 (D.Utah), aff'd 953 F.2d 1391 (10th Cir.1990) (holding that under claim for breach of duty to defend, limitations period accrued under Utah Code Ann. § 31A-21-313(1) when insurer began to incur defense expenses).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Stephen Moore
v.
Harlan Bockman, John E. Popovich, and Lucinda Bruner
91-1343.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit.
Feb 4, 1992.
953 F.2d 1391
Published

953 F.2d 1391

NOTICE: Although citation of unpublished opinions remains unfavored, unpublished opinions may now be cited if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue, and a copy is attached to the citing document or, if cited in oral argument, copies are furnished to the Court and all parties. See General Order of November 29, 1993, suspending 10th Cir. Rule 36.3 until December 31, 1995, or further order.

Stephen MOORE, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Harlan BOCKMAN, John E. Popovich, and Lucinda Bruner,
Defendants-Appellees.

No. 91-1343.

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.

Feb. 4, 1992.

Before SEYMOUR, STEPHEN H. ANDERSON and BALDOCK, Circuit Judges.[*]

ORDER AND JUDGMENT[**]

BALDOCK, Circuit Judge.

1

Plaintiff-appellant Stephen Moore appeals from an order entered August 26, 1991, dismissing his civil rights complaint brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed his notice of appeal on September 30, 1991, five days past the thirty-day time limit set forth in Fed.R.App.P. 4(a)(1). Moreover, plaintiff did not move for an extension of time as provided by Rule 4(a)(5). A timely filed notice of appeal is "mandatory and jurisdictional." Browder v. Director, Dep't of Corrections, 434 U.S. 257, 264 (1978). We therefore DISMISS the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. The mandate shall issue forthwith.

*

After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); 10th Cir.R. 34.1.9. The cause therefore is ordered submitted without oral argument

**

This order and judgment has no precedential value and shall not be cited, or used by any court within the Tenth Circuit, except for purposes of establishing the doctrines of the law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. 10th Cir.R. 36.3