green
Positive treatment
3.5 score
Treatment trajectory · 1992 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1992
2009
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
R. Steven Chaykowsky et al. v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company et al.
See Trump Taj Mahal Assocs. v. Costruzioni Aeronautiche Giovanni Agusta, S.p.A., 761 F. Supp. 1143, 1148 (D.N.J. 1991) (“Because the motion to remand addresses the subject matter jurisdiction of the court, we turn to it first.”), aff'd, 958 F.2d 365 Gd Cir. 1992). citizenship destroys the court’s subject-matter jurisdiction over the case, is that the party’s presence in the action is not required by Rule 19.” (alteration in original) (quoting 7 Wright & Miller’s Federal Practice & Procedure § 1685 (3d. ed. 2025))).
discussed
Cited "see"
Kolanovic v. Gida
See Trump Taj Mahal Assoc. v. Costruzioni Aeronautiche Giovanni, 761 F.Supp. 1143 (D.N.J.1991) (declining to adopt the tort of intentional spoliation prior to adoption by the New Jersey state courts.) [, aff'd 958 F.2d 365 (3d 1992), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 826 , 113 S.Ct. 84 , 121 L.Ed.2d 47 (1992) ]; PBA Local No. 38 v. Woodbridge Police Dep’t, 832 F.Supp. 808 (D.N.J.1993) (noting that it is not entirely clear that New Jersey recognizes the tort of spoliation of evidence, but assuming it does, [it recognizes the tort] in the limited context of ruling on motion to amend to add a claim for sp…
cited
Cited "see"
Paramount Aviation v. Agusta
See Trump Taj Mahal Assoc. v. Costruzioni Aeronautiche Giovanni Agusta, S.p.A., 761 F. Supp. 1143 (D.N.J. 1991), aff 'd mem., 958 F.2d 365 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 826 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see"
Paramount Aviation Corporation v. Gruppo Agusta Agusta Aerospace Corporation Costruzioni Aeronautiche Giovanni, Augusta, S.P.A. Augusta, S.P.A
See Trump Taj Mahal Assoc. v. Costruzioni Aeronautiche Giovanni Agusta, S.p.A, 761 F.Supp. 1143 (D.N.J.1991), aff'd mem., 958 F.2d 365 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 826 , 113 S.Ct. 84 , 121 L.Ed.2d 47 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Lightning Lube, Inc. Laser Lube, a New Jersey Corporation v. Witco Corporation Avis Service, Inc. Avis Lube, Inc. Avis Enterprises, Inc., Defendants/third Party v. Ralph Venuto, Individually and D/B/A Laser Lube, Lightning Lube, and Automotive Management Systems Carol Venuto, His Wife, Individually Automotive Management Systems, Inc., a New Jersey Corporation, Third Party Witco Corporation, Lightning Lube, Inc. Laser Lube, a New Jersey Corporation v. Witco Corporation Avis Service, Inc. Avis Lube, Inc. Avis Enterprises, Inc., Defendants/third Party v. Ralph Venuto, Individually and D/B/A Laser Lube, Lightning Lube, and Automotive Management Systems Carol Venuto, His Wife, Individually Automotive Management Systems, Inc., a New Jersey Corporation, Third Party Lightning Lube, Inc., T/a Laser Lube
See, e.g., Trump Taj Mahal Assocs. v. Construzioni Aeronautiche Giovanni Agusta, S.p.A., 761 F.Supp. 1143, 1164 (D.N.J.1991), aff'd, 958 F.2d 365 (3d Cir.) (table), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 113 S.Ct. 84 , 121 L.Ed.2d 47 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Lightning Lube, Inc. v. Witco Corp.
See, e.g., Trump Taj Mahal Assocs. v. Construzioni Aeronautiche Giovanni Agusta, S.p.A., 761 F.Supp. 1143, 1164 (D.N.J.1991), aff'd, 958 F.2d 365 (3d Cir.) (table), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 113 S.Ct. 84 , 121 L.Ed.2d 47 (1992).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
United States
v.
Yepes (Hernan)
v.
Yepes (Hernan)
91-5561.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit.
Feb 28, 1992.
Published
U.S.
v.
Yepes (Hernan)
NO. 91-5561
United States Court of Appeals,
Third Circuit.
Feb 28, 1992
Appeal From: D.N.J.,
Wolin, J.
1
AFFIRMED.