Alvaro Rafael Marquez-Bolano v. United States, 991 F.2d 786 (1st Cir. 1993). · Go Syfert
Search
Alvaro Rafael Marquez-Bolano v. United States, 991 F.2d 786 (1st Cir. 1993). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
34 citation events (3 in the last 25 years) across 6 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Steeves v. Bernstein, Shur, Sawyer & Nelson, P.C. (me, 1998-08-14)
Treatment trajectory · 1993 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1993 2009 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" Steeves v. Bernstein, Shur, Sawyer & Nelson, P.C.
Me. · 1998 · signal: see · confidence high
See Fleet Bank of Maine v. Prawer, 991 F.2d 786 (1st Cir.1993) (unpublished opinion).
cited Cited "see" Raffaele v. Ryder Dedicated Logistics, Inc.
D. Mass. · 1996 · signal: see · confidence high
See Frankina v. First Nat’l Bank of Boston, 801 F.Supp. 875, 883 (D.Mass.1992), aff'd, 991 F.2d 786 , 1993 WL 113727 (1st Cir.1993); Bergeson v. Franchi, 783 F.Supp. 713, 717 (D.Mass.1992).
discussed Cited "see" McDonnell v. Certified Engineering & Testing Co.
D. Mass. · 1995 · signal: see · confidence high
See Frankina v. First Nat’l Bank of Boston, 801 F.Supp. 875, 880 (D.Mass.1992), aff'd 991 F.2d 786 (TABLE); Stephen P. Johnson, The 1989 Massachusetts “Equal Rights Law”: A Short History, Boston B.J., March/April 1990, at 17.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Alvaro Rafael Marquez-Bolano
v.
United States
92-2278.
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit.
Apr 13, 1993.
991 F.2d 786
Unpublished

991 F.2d 786

NOTICE: First Circuit Local Rule 36.2(b)6 states unpublished opinions may be cited only in related cases.
Alvaro Rafael MARQUEZ-BOLANO, Petitioner, Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Respondent, Appellee.

No. 92-2278.

United States Court of Appeals,
First Circuit.

April 13, 1993

APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO

Alvaro Rafael Marquez-Bolano on brief pro se.

Daniel F. Lopez Romo, United States Attorney, Ivan Dominquez, Assistant United States Attorney, and Jose A. Quiles-Espinosa, Senior Litigation Counsel, on brief for appellee.

D.Puerto Rico

AFFIRMED.

Before Breyer, Chief Judge, Torruella and Cyr, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam.

1

Contrary to appellant's contention, the supervised release provision of the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1986 (ADAA), Pub. L. No. 99-570, 100 Stat. 3207, became effective on the date of the ADAA's enactment, i.e., October 27, 1986. Gozlon-Peretz v. United States, 498 U.S. 395 (1991). The no-parole provisions of the ADAA became effective on that date, as well. United States v. De Los Santos-Himitola, 924 F.2d 380, 381 (1st Cir. 1991). And, although Gozlon-Peretz involved 21 U.S.C. § 841 (controlled substances), we have held that its rationale applies equally to the parallel provisions in 21 U.S.C. § 960 (controlled substance on board vessel subject to jurisdiction of United States). Padilla Palacios v. United States, 932 F.2d 31, 33-34 (1st Cir. 1991). The appellant is not eligible for parole and his sentence, which included a 5 year term of supervised release, was lawful.

2

The judgment of the district court, dated September 23, 1992, and the amended judgment, dated October 1, 1992, are affirmed.