Emerson Eugene Stevens v. Fred Greene, Warden, 991 F.2d 791 (4th Cir. 1993). · Go Syfert
Search
Emerson Eugene Stevens v. Fred Greene, Warden, 991 F.2d 791 (4th Cir. 1993). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
45 citation events (7 in the last 25 years) across 6 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Hencely v. Fluor Corporation (scd, 2020-07-29)
Treatment trajectory · 1993 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1993 2009 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" Hencely v. Fluor Corporation
D.S.C. · 2020 · signal: see · confidence high
See Smith v. Mack Trucks, Inc., 991 F.2d 791 (Table), at *1 (4th Cir. 1993).
cited Cited "see" Bazuaye v. United States
D.D.C. · 1999 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Bazuaye, 991 F.2d 791 (4th Cir.1993) (Table) (unpublished op. at 1993 WL 102576 ).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." In Re Grand Jury Subpoena John Doe No. A01-209
E.D. Va. · 2002 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Sneed, 1993 WL 107409 at *1 , 991 F.2d 791 ("[N]o federal statute creates [a physician-patient] privilege.”); Hancock v. Dodson, 958 F.2d 1367, 1373 (6th Cir.1992) ("[T]he federal courts do not recognize a federal physician-patient privilege.”); United States v. Burzynski Cancer Research Institute, 819 F.2d 1301, 1311 (5th Cir.1988) ("In the context of federal criminal proceedings, no physician-patient privilege exists.”). 6 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Emerson Eugene Stevens
v.
Fred Greene, Warden
93-6030.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.
Apr 16, 1993.
991 F.2d 791
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Unpublished

991 F.2d 791

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Emerson Eugene STEVENS, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
Fred GREENE, Warden, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 93-6030.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: March 1, 1993
Decided: April 16, 1993

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior District Judge. (CA-92-540)

James W. Parker, FIRST LAW, INC., for Appellant.

Linwood Theodore Wells, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, for Appellee.

E.D.Va.

DISMISSED.

Before WIDENER, HAMILTON, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

OPINION

1

Emerson Eugene Stevens seeks to appeal the district court's order refusing habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C.s 2254 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court.[*] Stevens v. Greene, No. CA-92-540 (E.D. Va. Nov. 23, 1992). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

*

We have reviewed the additional materials forwarded to this Court by Stevens's attorney, but find that these materials do not relieve Stevens of the procedural bar created by his failure to properly raise the issues presented here in state court