green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
4.8 score
“o prove intentional discrimination it is not necessary to show an evil or hostile motive.”
Treatment trajectory · 1993 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1993
2009
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 9 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Shawn Katz, David Kirkpatrick, Camuel Buzan, and Victoria Xavier-Freyer, individually and in their representative capacity v. Tata Consultancy Services LTD.
o prove intentional discrimination it is not necessary to show an evil or hostile motive.
cited
Cited "see"
Utah Council, Trout Unlimited v. United States Army Corp. of Engineers
See Industrial Highway Corp. v. Danielson, 796 F.Supp. 121, 127 (D.N.J.1992), affd luithout opinion, 995 F.2d 217 (3d Cir.1993).
cited
Cited "see"
County of Charleston v. Sleepy Hollow Youth, Inc.
See Horizon House Developmental Servs., Inc. v. Township of Upper Southampton, 804 F.Supp. 683 (E.D.Pa.1992), aff'd, 995 F.2d 217 (3rd Cir.1993).
discussed
Cited "see"
ReMed Recovery Care Centers v. Township of Willistown
See Horizon House Developmental Serv., Inc. v. Township of Upper Southampton, 804 F.Supp. 683, 692 (E.D.Pa.1992), aff'd mem., 995 F.2d 217 (3d Cir.1993); see also Growth Horizons, Inc. v. Delaware County, *683 983 F.2d 1277, 1281-82 (3d Cir.1993); Epicenter of Steubenville, Inc. v. City of Steubenville, 924 F.Supp. 845, 849 (S.D.Ohio 1996) (citing cases).
discussed
Cited "see"
Salute v. Stratford Greens Garden Apartments
See 30 F.3d 1488 (table) This construction of the reasonable accommodation provision reflects the more general position prevalent in the Third Circuit that "one of the purposes behind the reasonable accommodation provision is to address individual needs and respond to individual circumstances," Horizon House Developmental Servs., Inc. v. Township of Upper Southampton, 804 F.Supp. 683, 699 (E.D.Pa.1992), aff'd, 995 F.2d 217 (3d Cir.1993) (table).
cited
Cited "see"
Alliance for the Mentally Ill v. City of Naperville
See Horizon House Developmental Servs., Inc. v. Township of Upper Southampton, 804 F.Supp. 683, 687-90, 694 (E.D.Pa.1992), aff'd, 995 F.2d 217 (3rd Cir.1993).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Grimes v. State Department of Social Services
The FHAA makes clear that residential providers, such as the Hannas, have standing to challenge the state laws and regulations which discriminate against them “because of a handicap” of the “person residing in or intending to reside” in their home. ( 42 U.S.C. § 3604 (f)(2); see also Horizon House v. Township of Upper Southampton (E.D.Pa. 1992) 804 F.Supp. 683, 692 , affd. (1993) 995 F.2d 217 ; Baxter v. City of Belleville, Ill.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Hill v. Community of Damien of Molokai
Id.; see also Horizon House Developmental Servs., Inc. v. Township of Upper Southampton, 804 F.Supp. 683, 699 (E.D.Pa.1992) (“One of the purposes behind the reasonable accommodation provision is to address individual needs and respond to individual circumstances.” (Emphasis added)), aff'd, 995 F.2d 217 (3rd Cir.1993). 45.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Precision Equities, Inc. v. Franklin Park Borough Zoning Hearing Board
See, e.g., Horizon House Developmental Services, Inc. v. Township of Upper Southampton, 804 F.Supp. 683 (E.D.Pa.1992), aff'd. 995 F.2d 217 (3d Cir. 1993) (providers of housing for the handicapped have standing under the Fair Housing Act to challenge local law imposing a 1000 foot distance requirement for group homes). 8 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Horizon House Development Services, Inc.
v.
Township of Upper Southampton, Pelligrino (Robert M.), Shafter (David), Crandley (Gerald), Martin (Charles H.), Held (John K.)
v.
Township of Upper Southampton, Pelligrino (Robert M.), Shafter (David), Crandley (Gerald), Martin (Charles H.), Held (John K.)
92-1791.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit.
May 10, 1993.
Cited by 2 opinions | Published
Horizon House Development Services, Inc.
v.
Township of Upper Southampton, Pelligrino (Robert M.),
Shafter (David), Crandley (Gerald), Martin
(Charles H.), Held (John K.)
NO. 92-1791
United States Court of Appeals,
Third Circuit.
May 10, 1993
Appeal From: E.D.Pa.,
Reed, J.,
1
AFFIRMED.