Curtis Leon Taylor, Sr. v. P. L. Huffman Edward W. Murray, 996 F.2d 1212 (4th Cir. 1993). · Go Syfert
Search
Curtis Leon Taylor, Sr. v. P. L. Huffman Edward W. Murray, 996 F.2d 1212 (4th Cir. 1993). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
52 citation events (11 in the last 25 years) across 21 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Town of Islip v. Datre (nyed, 2025-08-18)
Treatment trajectory · 1993 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1993 2009 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Town of Islip v. Datre
E.D.N.Y · 2025 · confidence medium
Mar. 22, 2023); see also Janki Bai Sahu, 528 F. App’x at 101 (“[C]ourts are not to lay aside traditional notions of remoteness, [and] proximate cause . . . when evaluating public nuisance claims.”).17 A defendant may be held liable for a public nuisance by “setting in motion or being a force in the sequence of events resulting in injury to the public.” City of New York, 247 F.R.D. at 347 ; e.g., State v. Schenectady 16 See, e.g., Shockley v. Hoechst Celanese Corp., 996 F.2d 1212, at *4 (4th Cir. 1993) (per curiam) (unpublished table decision) (holding that the jury could have reasona…
cited Cited "see" United States v. Blalock
D. Maryland · 1998 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Blalock, 1993 WL 238991 , 996 F.2d 1212 (4th Cir.1993)(unpublished).
cited Cited "see" Decora Inc. v. DW Wallcovering, Inc.
S.D.N.Y. · 1995 · signal: see · confidence high
See Rogers v. Pittston Co., 800 F.Supp. 350, 355 (W.D.Va.1992), aff'd, 996 F.2d 1212 (4th Cir.1993).
discussed Cited "see" Roberts & Schaefer Co. v. San-Con, Inc.
S.D.W. Va · 1995 · signal: see · confidence high
See Rogers v. Pittston Co., 800 F.Supp. 350, 353 (W.D.Va.1992), aff'd, 996 F.2d 1212 (4th Cir.1993); Stitz v. Bethlehem Steel Co., 650 F.Supp. 914, 916 (D.Md.1987); Garlow v. Zakaib, 186 W.Va. 457 , 413 S.E.2d 112, 115-16 (1991).
cited Cited "see, e.g." Pamela K. Hartnett v. Charles V. Hardenbergh, et al.
E.D. Va. · 2026 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Shockley v. Hoechst Celanese Corp., 996 F.2d 1212 (4th Cir. 1993) (unpublished table decision) (“It is not [the Court’s] task to discern something so inscrutable as the jury’s intent.”).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Moore v. United States
D.D.C. · 2015 · signal: see also · confidence low
Mining, 615 F.3d at 176 ("[I]n order to state a claim under § 1983, [the plaintiff] must have adequately pled the existence of a conspiracy between Defendants, who are private parties, and the judges of the Pennsylvania court system.”)); see also Platt v. Ihle, 996 F.2d 1212 (4th Cir.1993) ("We need not address the question of whether Bivens type action.may have, maintained against private persons, for we are of opinion that, even if Bivens actions are maintainable against private individuals under some circumstances, Platt has failed to allege with even minimal specificity any concerted ac…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Curtis Leon Taylor, Sr.
v.
P. L. Huffman Edward W. Murray
93-6393.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.
Jun 28, 1993.
996 F.2d 1212
Unpublished

996 F.2d 1212

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Curtis Leon TAYLOR, Sr., Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
P. L. HUFFMAN; Edward W. Murray, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 93-6393.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: June 7, 1993.
Decided: June 28, 1993.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, District Judge. (CA-92-663-R)

Curtis Leon Taylor, Sr., Appellant Pro Se.

Mark Ralph Davis, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

W.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before HALL, WILKINSON, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

OPINION

1

Curtis Leon Taylor, Sr., appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Taylor v. Huffman, No. CA-92-663-R (W.D. Va. Apr. 9, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED