Felix Gonzalez Gisbert v. U.S. Attorney Gen., 997 F.2d 1122 (5th Cir. 1993). · Go Syfert
Felix Gonzalez Gisbert v. U.S. Attorney Gen., 997 F.2d 1122 (5th Cir. 1993). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
58 citation events (35 in the last 25 years) across 17 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Alexis Barrera-Echavarria v. Richard H. Rison, Warden (ca9, 1995-01-12)
Treatment trajectory · 1993 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1993 2009 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers. How cited ↗
examined Cited as authority (quoted) Alexis Barrera-Echavarria v. Richard H. Rison, Warden (2×)
9th Cir. · 1995 · signal: accord · quote attribution · 2 verbatim quotes · confidence high
the language of the statute does not require the attorney general to parole any alien, nor does it mandate parole on any particular finding or findings or place any substantive restriction on the authority to deny parole.
cited Cited "see" Elbaz v. Ashcroft
5th Cir. · 2003 · signal: see · confidence high
See Gisbert v. U.S. Attorney Gen., 988 F.2d 1437, 1440 (5th Cir.), amended in part, 997 F.2d 1122 (5th Cir. 1993).
discussed Cited "see" Hernandez Nodarse v. United States
S.D. Tex. · 2001 · signal: see · confidence high
See Gisbert v. U.S. Attorney Gen., 988 F.2d 1437, 1439 (5th Cir.), amended on other grounds, 997 F.2d 1122 (5th Cir.1993); Alvarez-Mendez v. Stock, 941 F.2d 956, 959 (9th Cir.1991), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 842 , 113 S.Ct. 127 , 121 L.Ed.2d 82 (1992); Fernandez-Roque v. Smith, 734 F.2d 576, 578 (11th Cir.1984); Palma v. Verdeyen, 676 F.2d 100, 101 (4th Cir.1982).
cited Cited "see" Cruz-Elias v. United States Attorney General
E.D. Va. · 1994 · signal: see · confidence high
See Gisbert v. United States Attorney General, 988 F.2d 1437, 1440 , amended, 997 F.2d 1122 (5th Cir.1993) (describing this "entry fiction”).
discussed Cited "see" Alexis Barrera-Echavarria v. Richard H. Rison, Warden (2×)
9th Cir. · 1994 · signal: see · confidence high
See Gisbert v. U.S. Attorney General, 988 F.2d 1437, 1445-46 (5th Cir.), amended on other grounds, 997 F.2d 1122 (5th Cir.1993).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Mario Rosales-Garcia v. J.T. Holland, Warden (2×)
6th Cir. · 2001 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Gisbert v. U.S. Attorney General, 988 F.2d 1437, 1442 (5th Cir.1993),amended 997 F.2d 1122 (5th Cir.1993) (recognizing that excludable aliens have a substantive due process right to be free from "gross physical abuse").
cited Cited "see, e.g." SERGIO E SANTOS, JR v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE; IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE; JOHN B Z CAPLINGER; R MORTON
unknown court · signal: see also · confidence low
R. 47.6; see also Gisbert v. U.S. Attorney General, 998 F.2d 1437, 1441-44 (5th Cir.), modified, 997 F.2d 1122 (5th Cir. 1993). * Pursuant to 5TH CIR.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Felix Gonzalez Gisbert
v.
U.S. Attorney General
91-4477.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.
Aug 3, 1993.
997 F.2d 1122

997 F.2d 1122

Felix Gonzalez GISBERT, et al., Petitioners-Appellants,
v.
U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 91-4477.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fifth Circuit.

Aug. 3, 1993.

Leo Jerome Lahey, Lafayette, LA, Gary Leshaw, Atlanta Legal Aid Soc., Atlanta, GA, Mark D. Kemple, Karen M. Frederiksen, Los Angeles, CA, David A. Webster, Sumner & Hewes, Atlanta, GA, for petitioners-appellants.

Joseph S. Cage, Jr. U.S. Atty., Shreveport, LA, Emily A. Radford, Atty., Lauri S. Filppu, Deputy Director, Office of Imm. Lit., U.S. Dept. of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent-appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana; F.A. Little, Jr., Judge.

Before GARWOOD, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.[*]

PER CURIAM:

1

The Court sua sponte amends its prior judgment and opinion herein, reported at 988 F.2d 1437 (5th Cir.1993), by deleting therefrom all of footnote 5, 988 F.2d at 1440 n. 5, and all of footnote 24, 988 F.2d at 1449 n. 24. The mandate shall issue forthwith.

*

Judge John R. Brown was on the panel that heard oral argument in this case, but passed away before the decision was entered, and the panel accordingly acts through a quorum