United States v. Linwood Lee Taylor, 106 F.3d 394 (4th Cir. 1997). · Go Syfert
Search
United States v. Linwood Lee Taylor, 106 F.3d 394 (4th Cir. 1997). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
46 citation events (6 in the last 25 years) across 7 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Brady v. The Dow Chemical Company (wvsd, 2019-07-31)
Treatment trajectory · 1997 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1997 2011 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Brady v. The Dow Chemical Company
S.D.W. Va · 2019 · signal: see · confidence high
See Underwood v. Fluor Daniel, Inc., 106 F.3d 394 (4th Cir. 1996) (table), 1997 WL 33123, at *5 (holding that plaintiff’s § 1132(c)(1) “claim accrued, at the latest, when she discovered—or reasonably should have discovered—that she was entitled by law to receive individual notice of her rights”); see also Shafer, 970 F.2d at 1319–20 (holding that plaintiff’s ERISA claim accrued “when [plaintiff] learned of the alleged wrongful advice” that was subject of claim).
cited Cited "see, e.g." Honey v. Dignity Health
D. Nev. · 2014 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Underwood v. Fluor Daniel, Inc., 106 F.3d 394 , *4 (4th Cir.1997) (awarding the maximum penalty despite no evidence of prejudice).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
United States
v.
Linwood Lee Taylor
96-7034.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.
Jan 23, 1997.
106 F.3d 394
Unpublished

106 F.3d 394

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff--Appellee,
v.
Linwood Lee TAYLOR, Defendant--Appellant.

No. 96-7034.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Jan. 9, 1997.
Decided Jan. 23, 1997.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, District Judge. (CR-92-149, CA-95-865-R)

Linwood Lee Taylor, Appellant Pro Se. Karen Breeding Peters, Assistant United States Attorney, Julie C. Dudley, Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before HALL and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1994), amended by Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub.L. No. 104-132, 110 Stat. 1214. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Taylor, Nos. CR92-149; CA-95-865-R (W.D.Va. June 14, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED