George Reynold Evans, Sr. v. David Godwin, 106 F.3d 390 (4th Cir. 1997). · Go Syfert
Search
George Reynold Evans, Sr. v. David Godwin, 106 F.3d 390 (4th Cir. 1997). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
52 citation events (8 in the last 25 years) across 8 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Cacciavillano v. Saul (pamd, 2022-07-05)
Treatment trajectory · 1997 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1997 2011 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Cacciavillano v. Saul
M.D. Penn. · 2022 · signal: see · confidence high
See Fagg v. Chater, 106 F.3d 390 , at *2 (4th Cir. 1997) (table) (citing Evangelista v. Sec’y of Health and Human Servs., 826 F.3d 136, 140 (1st Cir. 1987) (“if a losing party could vault the ‘newness’ hurdle . . . merely by retaining an expert to reappraise the evidence and come up with a conclusion different from that reached by the hearing office, then the criterion would be robbed of all meaning.”).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Union Ins. Co. v. SOLEIL GROUP, INC.
D.S.C. · 2008 · signal: see also · confidence low
Where the motion is nothing more than a request that the district court change its mind, ... it is not authorized by Rule 60(b).” Williams, 674 F.2d at 312-13 ; see also Copley v. United States, 106 F.3d 390 , at *1 (4th Cir.1997) (unpublished table decision) (citing Hartman v. Lauchli, 304 F.2d 431, 432 (8th Cir.1962), for the proposition that “Rule 60(b) was not intended as a substitute for a direct appeal from an erroneous judgment.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Smith v. Barnhart
E.D.N.C. · 2005 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Dixon v. Chater, 106 F.3d 390 , 1997 WL 22237, at *3 (4th Cir.1997) (per curiam) (“[I]t is the responsibility of the Commissioner, not the appellate court, to review the case, make findings of fact, and resolve conflicts of evidence.”).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
George Reynold Evans, Sr.
v.
David Godwin
96-2565.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.
Jan 31, 1997.
106 F.3d 390
Unpublished

106 F.3d 390

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
George Reynold EVANS, Sr., Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
David GODWIN, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 96-2565.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Jan. 23, 1997.
Decided Jan. 31, 1997.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. James C. Fox, Chief District Judge. (CA-96-138-7-F)

George Reynold Evans, Sr., Appellant Pro Se.

Before RUSSELL, WILKINS, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals the district court's orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint and on his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Evans v. Godwin, No. CA-96-138-7-F (E.D.N.C. Oct. 21, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED