Salas-Rojos v. Cruise Line, 106 F.3d 383 (1st Cir. 1997). · Go Syfert
Salas-Rojos v. Cruise Line, 106 F.3d 383 (1st Cir. 1997). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
12 citation events (1 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Cited for

No citing cases on record.

Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Salas-Rojos
v.
Cruise Line
96-1503.
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit.
Jan 15, 1997.
Unpublished opinion
106 F.3d 383
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Unpublished

106 F.3d 383

NOTICE: First Circuit Local Rule 36.2(b)6 states unpublished opinions may be cited only in related cases.
Jesus SALAS-RIJOS and Ana Salas, Plaintiffs, Appellants,
v.
COSTA CRUISE LINES, N.V., et al., Defendants, Appellees.

No. 96-1503.

United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit.

Jan. 14, 1997.

APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO [Hon. Carmen Consuelo Cerezo, U.S. District Judge]

Harry A. Ezratty on brief for appellants.

William A. Graffam, Jose Luis Suarez-Villafane, and Jimenez, Graffam & Lausell on brief for appellees.

Before SELYA, Circuit Judge, and COFFIN, Senior Circuit Judge, and LYNCH, Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM.

[*~383–384]1

Having reviewed the record and considered the parties' briefs, we are fully persuaded that the court below did not err in granting summary judgment in favor of the defendant. Since the reasons underlying this ruling are clearly set forth in the district court's opinion, see Salas-Rijos v. Costa Cruise Lines, N.V., No. 94-2342CCC (D.P.R. Feb. 9, 1995), we need go no further. Instead, we affirm the judgment for substantially the reasons elucidated by Chief Judge Cerezo in her well-reasoned rescript.

2

Affirmed.