green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
7.0 score
“28 u.s.c. 1915 is designed to ensure that indigent 6 litigants have meaningful access to the federal courts.”
Treatment trajectory · 1996 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1996
2011
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Pinson v. Othon
28 u.s.c. 1915 is designed to ensure that indigent 6 litigants have meaningful access to the federal courts.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
State v. Davila
In support of that claim, it cites United States v. Michaels, 796 F.2d 1112, 1116 (9th Cir. 1986), United States v. Georgiou, 111 F.3d 125, 141 (3d Cir. 2015), cert. filed, No. 14-1535 (U.S. June 25, 2015), and United States v. Andrus, 775 F.2d 825, 843 (7th Cir. 1985).
cited
Cited "see"
Yount v. Pennsylvania Department of Corrections
See Turner, at 89, 107 S.Ct. 2254 . [1] The majority opinion follows Abdul-Akbar v. Department of Corrections, 910 F.Supp. 986 (D.Del.1995), aff'd without opinion, 111 F.3d 125 (3d Cir.1997).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Krause (In Re Krause)
See Berkery v. Comm’r, I.R.S., 192 B.R. 835, 841 (E.D.Pa.1996), aff'd 111 F.3d 125 (3d Cir.1997); In re Sommers, 209 B.R. 471, 481 (Bankr.N.D.Ill.1997); In re Carey, 326 B.R. 816, 821 (Bankr.E.D.Cal.2005); In re Fliss, 339 B.R. 481, 486 (Bankr.N.D.Iowa 2006). 117 .
cited
Cited "see"
Scarpiello v. United States (In Re Scarpiello)
See Berkery v. Commissioner, 192 B.R. 835, 840 (E.D.Pa.1996), aff'd 111 F.3d 125 (3d Cir.) cert denied, 522 U.S. 81 , 118 S.Ct. 208 , 139 L.Ed.2d 144 (1997).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Weiss (In Re Weiss)
See Berkery v. Commissioner, 192 B.R. 835, 840 (E.D.Pa.1996), aff'd, 111 F.3d 125 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. --, 118 S.Ct. 208 , 139 L.Ed.2d 144 (1997).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Hooks v. State of Alaska
See also Abdul–Akbar v. Dep’t of Corr., 910 F. Supp. 986 (D.Del., 1995), aff’d, 111 F.3d 125 (3d Cir.) (table decision), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 852 (1997).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
American International Surplus Lines Insurance Company
v.
Ies Lead Paint Division, Inc., Iemc Environmental Group, Inc., International Environmental Management Corporation, Roger Dixon, Barri Schurelds, Samuel Robinson, Forrest J. Pearson, Rudy Langhorne
v.
Ies Lead Paint Division, Inc., Iemc Environmental Group, Inc., International Environmental Management Corporation, Roger Dixon, Barri Schurelds, Samuel Robinson, Forrest J. Pearson, Rudy Langhorne
96-1330.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit.
Mar 17, 1997.
American International Surplus Lines Insurance Company
v.
IES Lead Paint Division, Inc., IEMC Environmental Group,
Inc., International Environmental Management
Corporation, Roger Dixon, Barri
Schurelds, Samuel Robinson,
Forrest J. Pearson,
Rudy Langhorne
NO. 96-1330
United States Court of Appeals,
Third Circuit.
Mar 17, 1997
Appeal From: E.D.Pa. ,No.94cv04627
1
Affirmed.